The development of Germanic analytical tenses

Author:

Botsman Andriy1ORCID,Dmytruk Olga1ORCID,Kozlovska Tamara1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Abstract

The stages that encompass the future tense development are singled out as discrete phenomena within the process of the Germanic language development. The Gothic verb system can serve as the background for the investigation of the tense transformations in question. The difficulties of tense examination in the Old Germanic languages were connected with some conceptions about the Indo-Iranian and Greek languages that used to dominate in the scientific circles for a long time. Those conceptions were based on Latin and Greek patterns and postulated the use of present, past and future tenses in all Indo-European languages. The above conceptions were ruined when the study of Tokharian and Hittite demonstrated the use of the present tense for the description of future actions. The idea of losing “the protolanguage inheritance” was proved wrong, and it was incorrect to transfer the complex tense system of Sanskrit, Greek, and Latin to other Proto-Indo-European languages. The examination of the tense differentiation in Gothic (as the main source of the Old Germanic language) demonstrates that the Gothic infinitive functioned as a no-particular-time unit, while personal verb forms were involved in performing tense functions. The Gothic present tense verbs represented present and future tenses and no-particular-time phenomena. Some periphrastic forms containing preterite-present verbs with the infinitive occurred sporadically. The periphrastic forms correlated with Greek and Latin patterns of the same future tense meaning. The periphrastic future forms in Gothic often contained some modal shades of meaning. The Gothic present tense functioned as a colony-forming archi-unit and a pluripotential (temporal) precursor. The periphrastic Gothic future forms are recognised as a monopotential (temporal) precursor with some modal meaning. The key research method used in the present article is the comparative historical method. The authors viewed it as the most reliable and appropriate for the study of tense forms.

Publisher

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

Subject

General Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. Ammann H. (1936). Germanischen und indogermanischen. Germanen und Indogermanen. Volkstum, Sprache, Heimat, Kultur, Festschrift für Herman Hirt. Heidelberg: Fachbuchverlag, 328-342 [in German].

2. Arntz H. (1936). Gemeingermanisch. Germanen und Indogermanen. Volkstum, Sprache, Heimat, Kultur, Festschrift für Herman Hirt. Heidelberg: Fachbuchverlag, 429-451. [in German].

3. Behaghel O. (1923). Deutche Syntax. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universität. Bd.II. B. Adverbum, C. Verbum, 372 s. [in German].

4. Beheydt G. (2005). The absolute and the relative present tense with future time references in English and Dutch. Crosslinguistic Views on Tense, Aspect and Modality. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 15-32 [in English].

5. Botsman, A.V. & Morenets, I.M. (2015). Modals and periphrastics in English and Dutch. Science ans Education. A New Dimension. Philology, 68 (III), 7–10. [in English].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3