Abstract
The ethical dimension of scientific research and its relevance to socio-cultural transformations is traditional for philosophical discourse, however, for Ukrainian philosophy, the resolution of global and local contradictions in the development of the scientific sphere is of particular importance. The question of the ethical foundation of conducting scientific research and developing innovations, the balance between the search for scientific solutions for specific scientific problems, and the ethos of civilizational responsibility, inclusion in the civilizational agenda with its corresponding regulatory procedures, is debatable in the global research space. Modern social turbulence leaves its mark on the field of scientific and innovative activity, which requires the adoption of an updated value paradigm in response to these challenges (global — Industry 4.0, sustainable development, etc. ); national — military aggression, political modernization, etc. ). It was possible to demonstrate that the concept of «responsible research and innovation», not only at the level of political declarations, but also of social practice, can act as a basis for the development of the Ukrainian sphere of science and innovative development. The real practice of implementing the ethos of responsibility in the field of science and innovation requires not only a developed state policy, but also an update of the key provisions of the philosophy of education in the field of training scientifically gifted youth.
Publisher
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Subject
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Reference13 articles.
1. 1. Horbov, V.V. & Batrak, D.A. (2020). Sotsial'na turbulentnist' yak stan suchasnoho suspil'stva. Tradytsiyi ta novatsiyi u rozvytku suchasnoyi sotsiolohichnoyi nauky: doslidzhennya molodykh vchenykh. Kyiv: KNEU, 183-186 [in Ukrainian].
2. 2. Zubov, V.O. & Kryveha, L.D. (2015). Sotsialna turbulentnist yak pidgruntya zmin u svitohlyadnykh ustanovakh suchasnoyi lyudyny. Aktualni problemy filosofiyi ta sotsiolohiyi, 8, 66-68 [in Ukrainian].
3. 3. Pinker, S. (2019). Prosvitnytstvo s'ohodni. Arhumenty na rozvytok rozumu, nauky ta prohresu. Kyiv: Nash format, 560 s. [in Ukrainian].
4. 4. Shashkova, L.O. (2021). Politychnyy povorot u filosofiyi nauky. Politolohichnyy visnyk. Vyp 87. S. 14-23. https://doi. org/10.17721/2415-881x. 2021.87.14-23 [in Ukrainian]
5. 5. Boenink, M., & Kudina O. (2020). Values in responsible research and innovation: from entities to practices. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7:3, 450-470. DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2020.1806451
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Cognitive Processes in the Digital Realm;Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics;2024-04-05