Author:
Kharchenko O.V., ,Ziatdinov Yu.K.,Mavrenkov O.Ye., ,
Abstract
The urgency of the issue of quantitative assessment of technical perfection of aircraft weapons is determined primarily by the task of comparing alternative models and choosing the best options when developing or purchasing for the needs of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Analysis of the practical application of known methods of decision theory shows that they do not actually solve the problem of estimating the technical level of the product in quantitative terms, but only allow to build a certain priority series of evaluated products in order of increasing / decreasing their technical level. ) the magnitude (degree) of change in the level of technical excellence of one product in relation to another. In this sense, qualimetric methods allow for quantitative assessment of the technical level (quality) of products in relation to the basic (reference) sample, which determines the convenience of their use to solve problems of choice. But the use of the methodological apparatus of qualimetry in each case requires its adaptation taking into account the characteristics of the evaluated product in terms of substantiation of its defining indicators of technical excellence and determining their relative importance. The article presents the results of the authors' research on the development of methods for assessing the technical level (quality) of guided aircraft as part of the support system for decisions on the development / purchase of samples of weapons and military equipment for the Armed Forces of Ukraine. The developed methodology is based on a qualimetric complex method of quality assessment of complex technical systems, based on the ratio of determinants of technical excellence of the evaluated and basic (reference) products, taking into account the relative importance (weight) of such indicators. The presented technique allows you to quickly (with minimal time compared to expert evaluation procedures) to calculate the technical level of aircraft damage in order to compare (select).
Publisher
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Subject
General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science
Reference14 articles.
1. 1.Han-Lin Li (1987). "Solving Discrete Multicriteria Decision ProbIems Based опLogic-Based Decision Support Systems". /North-Holland: Decision Support Systems, Vol. 3(1). -pp.101-119.
2. 2.Rua,B. (1976) "Classification and selection in the presence of several criteria"/ Analysis issues and decision-making procedures, pp. 80-107.
3. 3.Hwang, С.andYoon, К. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making -Springer-Verlag.
4. 4.Saaty, Т.(2008). "Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process", Int. J. Services Sciences, Vol. 1, No.1.
5. 5.Saaty, Т. andVargas, L.(2001)Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, Kluwer Academic, 346 p..