Affiliation:
1. National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute»
Abstract
Reproductive, surrogate, abortion and other types of medical tourism are evidence of the demand for certain practices and unresolved biopolitical issues at the level of legislation of different countries with different attitudes to socio-economic and biological inequality. Ukraine is remaining the center of world reproductive tourism. In the large cities of Ukraine, the reproductive business is developing and there are clinics that provide services using assisted reproductive technologies. This actualizes the problem of unresolved biopolitical issues and strengthens their impact on surrogacy practices in Ukraine. Needs of deep socio-philosophical analyses of problems of surrogacy is reasoned, especially when it comes to ethics of risk. It is noted that laws which rule surrogacy, lags behind reproductive and social practices and needs. Emphasis is placed on the fact that the legislation in biopolitics is relevant for a short time: to a new stage of development of technological potentiality. Legislation on surrogacy in Ukraine is more regulated and in part more progressive than in many countries around the world, and based on genetic relatedness. The challenges and threats to the Ukrainian society, which are hiding in prohibitive legislative initiatives in the field of reproduction, have been clarified. An analysis of recent abolitionist initiatives, including those from religious organizations, has been conducted. It has been shown that the protection against exploitation invoked by abolitionists is achieved in a clearly disproportionate and burdensome way for women themselves. Conclusion that in order to avoid negative biopolitical scenarios, Ukrainian society should avoid moral panic, form a special respect for technology and scientific knowledge, recognize the authority of socio-humanitarian research and appreciate data obtained by scientists have been done.
Publisher
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Reference14 articles.
1. Zakonoproekt pro vnesennja zmin do dejakyx zakonodavčyx aktiv Ukrajiny ščodo pytanʹ zastosuvannja dopomižnyx reproduktyvnyx texnolohij № 3488 vid 15.05.2020 [Bill on Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Concerning the Application of Assisted Reproductive Technologies № 3488. 15.05.2020] (2020). Verxovna Rada Ukrayiny. Oficijnyj veb-portal. URL: https://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=68850 (in Ukrainian).
2. Zvernennja katolycʹkyx jepyskopiv Ukrajiny ščodo surohatnoho materynstva [Appeal of Catholic bishops of Ukraine regarding surrogacy] (2020). Informacijnyj resurs Ukrajinsʹkoji Hreko-Katolycʹkoji Cerkvy. May 14, 2020. URL: http://news.ugcc.ua/documents/zvernennya_katolitskih_i episkop%D1%96v_ukraini_do_vladi_ta_vs%D1%96h_lyudey_dobroi_vol%D1%96_na_tem _surogatnogo_materinstva_89645.html (in Ukrainian).
3. Konvencija Rady Jevropy pro zaxyst prav ta hidnosti ljudyny u zvjazku z zastosuvannjam dosjahnenʹ biolohiji ta medycyny: konvencija pro prava ljudyny ta biomedycynu. [Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Dignity of the Human Being with regard to the Application of Biology and Medicine: Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine] (1997). Verxovna Rada Ukrayiny. Oficijnyj veb-portal. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_334#Text (in Ukrainian).
4. Molodʹ ta molodižna polityka v Ukrajini: socialʹno-demohrafični aspekty [Youth and youth policy in Ukraine: socio-demographic aspects] (2010). Za redakcijeju E.M. Libanovoji. Kyiv: Instytut demohrafiji ta socialʹnyx doslidženʹ im. M.V. Ptuxy NAN Ukrajiny. 248 s. (in Ukrainian).
5. Osnovy socialʹnoji koncepciji Ukrajinsʹkoji Pravoslavnoji Cerkvy. Problemy bioetyky [Fundamentals of the social concept of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. Problems of bioethics]. Oficijnyj sajt «Ukrajinsʹka Pravoslavna Cerkva». URL: http://orthodox.org.ua/page/sots%D1%96alnakontsepts% D1%96ya (in Ukrainian).