Abstract
Introduction. This paper reports on the results of the initial stage of the study targeted at carrying out a comprehensive comparative research into the educational capacity of two online tools that were used to teach academic writing to university students in the emergency online learning under the COVID-19 pandemic. Since this kind of online educational activity was meaningfully different from well-planned online experiences in terms of planning, preparation, and development, the authors were required to find the tools and online platform to match a range of criteria, such as: accessibility of the tool/platform; high task generation capacity; feedback generation capacity as well as the capacity to disable academic dishonesty. The objective of this paper is to consider the impact of technological support of online writing instruction on the quality of the students’ cause-effect essays as well as on building writing skills of the learners. Methodology. The research is designed as an experimental online training of the 3rd-year students of the Institute of Philology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (n=42). Authors 1 and 2 acted as teachers in the process of online writing instruction with the involvement of ZenGengo and PaperRater platforms, which, presumably, adds limitations to this research. Results and discussion. The research results prove a positive impact of the indicated online platforms on improving the overall quality of students’ written products. However, the data obtained show an uneven impact of the platforms on both improving the quality of a written product and the development of students’ integrated writing skills. Language, rhetorical, and textual skills of students were more influenced as opposed to the ability to integrate information from reading/listening sources. The overall conclusion drawn from the research exploration is that only targeted choice of online tools can lead to significant improvement in targeted skills. For online learning to be effective, the tools used in it need to be user-friendly and have a strong potential for optimization in terms of time-consumption and labor-intensiveness. Further prospects for research lie in exploring the educational potential of other platforms as well as investigating the impact of using multimedia tools on other aspects of academic writing
Publisher
Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv
Reference31 articles.
1. Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class Differences: Online Education in the United States, 2010. The Sloan Consortium. http://sloanconsortium.org/publications/survey/class_differences
2. Alexander, Jonathan. (2006). Digital youth: Emerging literacies on the World Wide Web. Kresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
3. Online and remote learning in higher education institutes: a necessity in light of COVID pandemic;Ali;High Educ Stud 10 (3),2020
4. Alkhataba, A.H., Abdul-Hamid, S. & Bashir, I. (2018). Technology-Supported Online Writing: An Overview of Six Major Web 2.0 Tools for Collaborative-Online Writing. Arab World English Journal, 9 (1), 433-446. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no1.30
5. CALL and Teaching writing: Language teachers' attitude, an Iranian survey;Amirsheibani;Procedia - Social and behavioral studies 98,2014
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献