Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of monotherapy of ulcerative colitis with mesalazine MMX and combination therapy with non-prolonged mesalazines with rectal forms

Author:

Knyazev O. V.1ORCID,Kagramanova A. V.2ORCID,Lishchinskaya A. A.3ORCID,Babaian A. F.3ORCID,Shkurko T. V.4ORCID,Nanaeva B. A.5ORCID,Li I. A.3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center; Ryzhikh State Scientific Center of Coloproctology; Research Institute of Health Organization and Medical Management

2. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center; Research Institute of Health Organization and Medical Management

3. Loginov Moscow Clinical Scientific Center

4. Ryzhikh State Scientific Center of Coloproctology; Research Institute of Health Organization and Medical Management

5. Ryzhikh State Scientific Center of Coloproctology

Abstract

Introduction. According to clinical guidelines, the treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) is carried out as combination therapy with mesalazine in rectal forms.The aim was to compare the effectiveness of treatment of moderate severity UC patients receiving mesalazine MMH as monotherapy and mesalazine in combination with mesalazine for rectal use.Materials and methods. Comparative clinical analysis of the results of treatment of patients with moderate UC receiving mesalazine MMX as monotherapy (1st group, 44 patients) and mesalazine in combination with mesalazine for rectal use (microclysters, suppositories) (2nd group, 40 patients) was performed.Results and discussion. After 2 weeks of therapy with mesalazine MMX, 95.0% of the 1st group patients responded to therapy with mesalazine MMX and continued treatment with it as monotherapy (without microclysters and suppositories). In Group 2, 97.2% of patients responded to mesalazine therapy and continued treatment with topical forms of mesalazine - microglia and suppositories. After 12 weeks, 87.5% of the 44 patients in Group 1 who responded to mesalazine MMX therapy and 88.9% of the 40 patients in Group 2 who responded to mesalazine therapy achieved clinical remission. After 52 weeks, 82.5% of 44 Group 1 patients and 86.1% of 40 Group 2 patients remained in clinical remission. The Meio index decreased from 7.9 ± 0.13 to 2.4 ± 0.4 points in group 1 and from 8.0 ± 0.17 to 2.3 ± 0.2 in group 2. There was no statistically significant difference in the level o  laboratory indices between the groups after 12 and 52 weeks (p > 0.05).Conclusion. Our study confirms that continuous regular administration of MMX mesalazine as monotherapy in doses according to the clinical guidelines is comparable in its effectiveness to combined therapy with non prolonged mesalazine and topical forms of mesalazine in patients with UC of moderate severity.

Publisher

Remedium, Ltd.

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3