Affiliation:
1. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Abstract
Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is recognized as a highly effective and convenient method for preventing unwanted pregnancy. However, in real clinical practice, the level of implementation of LARC remains relatively low, which, presumably, may be related to misconceptions about their contraceptive efficacy and side effects among health professionals and patients. One method of long-acting reversible contraception is the intrauterine device. Hormone-containing intrauterine systems are recognized as one of the most affordable contraceptive methods, characterized by a very low failure rate (less than 1%), which does not depend on the patient’s compliance. A review of the literature focuses on the efficacy and safety of a low-dose levonorgestrelcontaining intrauterine system containing 19.5 mg of levonorgestrel (LNG-IUD 12). We present data on the advantages of this intrauterine system in comparison with its counterparts. Analysis of the literature has shown that adherence to low-dose contraception is observed among women of reproductive age. The smaller diameter of the guide tube is associated with a more successful and less painful insertion of the device into the uterine cavity. This may be an obvious advantage for young, nulliparous women. In addition, the LNG-IUD has a predominantly local progestogenic effect on the endometrium, so there is a relatively low development of systemic effects. Despite its lower levonorgestrel content, the LNG IUD 12 (Kyleena LNG 19.5 mg, levonorge strel-releasing intrauterine system with an average LNG release of 12 µg/24 h in vivo over the first year of use) has a high level of contraceptive efficacy. Thus, LNG-IUD 12 is associated with a favorable efficacy and safety profile regardless of a woman’s age or parity, which has been confirmed by the results of clinical trials.
Reference21 articles.
1. Wu J.P., Moniz M.H., Ursu A.N. Long-acting Reversible Contraception – Highly Efficacious, Safe, and Underutilized. JAMA. 2018;320(4):397–398. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.8877.
2. Kavanaugh M.L., Jerman J. Contraceptive method use in the United States: trends and characteristics between 2008, 2012 and 2014. Contraception. 2018;97(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.10.003.
3. Beshar I., So J., Chelvakumar M., Cahill E.P., Shaw K.A., Shaw J.G. Socioeconomic differences persist in use of permanent vs long-acting reversible contraception: An analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth, 2006 to 2010 vs 2015 to 2017. Contraception. 2021;103(4):246–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.12.008.
4. Lindh I., Skjeldestad F.E., Gemzell-Danielsson K., Heikinheimo O., Hognert H., Milsom I., Lidegaard Ø. Contraceptive use in the nordic countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(1):19–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13055.
5. Baron M.M., Potter B., Schrager S. A Review of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Methods and Barriers to Their Use. WMJ. 2018;117(4):156–159. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30407765.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献