Affiliation:
1. Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky;
Regional Clinical Hospital
2. Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after Professor V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky
Abstract
The review provides current data on new options for the treatment of severe bronchial asthma. The prevalence of severe asthma ranges from 3% to 10%, but it is for the treatment of this group of patients that more than 80% of the funds allocated for the treatment of the disease as a whole are spent. Patients with severe bronchial asthma make up a special category, since traditional therapy, effective in most patients with bronchial asthma, does not allow controlling the disease. Heterogeneity and multivariate disease dictate the need to develop a personalized approach, which is impossible without significant financial and personnel investments. Understanding the pathogenetic pathways underlying the development of inflammation in asthma was the impetus for the development of targeted therapies. Five genetically engineered immunobiological drugs have been developed and approved for patients with severe allergic and/or eosinophilic bronchial asthma. The choice of the right medication should depend on the correct diagnosis of severe asthma, understanding the patient’s endotype, and accounting for patient-specific factors. It is worth noting that all approved biologics and most biologics currently in development focus on T2-immune response. To be sure, there is a huge pool of patients who register a different type of inflammation. And therefore, despite the rapid development of knowledge in the field of targeted therapy of bronchial asthma, further decoding and deepening of knowledge about the pathophysiological mechanisms, in particular non-T2 inflammation, as well as an analysis of the experience of using existing drugs to clearly understand the indications, as well as to assess the effectiveness and safety of existing treatments.
Reference85 articles.
1. Corren J. Asthma phenotypes and endotypes: an evolving paradigm for classification. Discov Med. 2013;15(83):243–249. Available at: https://www.discoverymedicine.com/Jonathan-Corren/2013/04/26/asthmaphenotypes-and-endotypes-an-evolving-paradigm-for-classification/.
2. Thomas M., Gruffydd-Jones K., Stonham C., Ward S., Macfarlane T.V. Assessing asthma control in routine clinical practice: use of the Royal College of Physicians ‘3 questions’. Prim Care Respir J. 2009;18(2):83–88. https://doi.org/10.3132/pcrj.2008.00045.
3. Geppe N.A., Kolosova N.G., Kondyurina E.G., Malakhov A.B., Mizernitsky Yu.L., Revyakina V.A. (eds.). National program “Bronchial asthma in children. Treatment strategy and prevention”. 5th ed. Moscow: Originalmaket; 2017. 160 p. (In Russ.) Available at: http://astgmu.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Natsionalnaya-programma-BA-u-detej.-Strategiyalecheniya-i-profilaktika.pdf.
4. Masoli M., Fabian D., Holt S., Beasley R. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Program. The global burden of asthma: executive summary of the GINA Dissemination Committee Report. Allergy. 2004;59(5):469–478. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2004.00526.x.
5. Barnes P.J., Adcock I.M. Glucocorticoid resistance in inflammatory diseases. Lancet. 2009;373(9678):1905–1917. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60326-3.