Affiliation:
1. Federal State Budgetary Institution «Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation.
Abstract
Now the number of patients receiving immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors is growing. At the same time, clinicians increasingly encounter such a clinical phenomenon as pseudoprogression. Nowadays we have no radiological evidences of pseudoprogression. The every such case requires an individual decision.
Reference20 articles.
1. Chiou V.L., Burotto M. Pseudoprogression and Immune-Related Response in Solid Tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Nov 1;33(31):3541-3.
2. Eisenhauer E.A., Therasse P., Bogaerts J. et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur. J. Cancer. 2009 Januar;45(2):228–47.
3. Wolchok J.D., Hoos A., Bohnsack O. et al. Guidelines for the Evaluation of Immune Therapy Activity in Solid Tumors: Immune-
4. Related Response Criteria. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(23) December 1, 2009.
5. Nishino M., Gargano M., Suda M., Ramaiya N.H., Hodi F.S. Optimizing immune-related tumor response assessment: does reducing the number of lesions impact response assessment in melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab? J Immuno ther Cancer. 2014; 2: 17. doi:10.1186/2051-1426-2-17.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献