Diagnostic value of serological markers for celiac disease in children

Author:

Dmitrieva Yu. A.1ORCID,Zakharova I. N.1ORCID,Osmanov I. M.2ORCID,Gostyukhina A. D.1ORCID,Teslenko S. E.3ORCID,Radchenko E. R.4ORCID,Miyanova A. R.5ORCID,Scorobogatova E. V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education; Bashlyaeva Children’s City Clinical Hospital

2. Bashlyaeva Children’s City Clinical Hospital; Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

3. Lomonosov Moscow State University

4. Bashlyaeva Children’s City Clinical Hospital

5. Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education

Abstract

Introduction. Serologic tests are the main tool to screen for celiac disease. The serologic tests for tissue transglutaminase (tTG-IgA) antibodies combined with the assessment of the total serum IgA concentration is recommended as a primary test. Other serological markers, in particular IgA and/or IgG antibodies against deamidated gliadin peptides (DGP-IgG/IgA) and native gliadin (AGA-IgA/IgG), are not recommended for use in diagnosing celiac disease in immunocompetent patients.Aim. To determine the diagnostic value of serological markers during the initial examination for celiac disease in children.Materials and methods. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value of tTG-IgA/IgG, DPG-IgA/IgG, AGA-IgA/IgG were calculated for a group of 1247 children.Results. Celiac disease was diagnosed in 101 patients of the study group. Tissue transglutaminase IgA antibodies demonstrated the highest sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 98.02, 99.48, 94.29 and 99.82%, respectively. DPG-IgA/IgG, AGA-IgA were inferior in sensitivity and specificity to tTG-IgA, the positive predictive value of DGP-IgG and AGA-IgA was 34.62 and 34.21%, respectively. AGA-IgG showed the worst specificity (40.3%) and positive predictive values (12.41%).Discussion The low predictive value of the positive results of AGA IgA and DPG IgG determines the extremely high percentage of false-positive results for these tests. In none of the cases of an isolated elevation in AGA and DPG antibodies the diagnosis of celiac disease was confirmed, if tissue transglutaminase IgA antibody concentrations were normal.Conclusion. The results of our study are fully consistent with the position of modern clinical guidelines, demonstrating the maximum diagnostic value of tissue transglutaminase IgA antibody during examination for celiac disease. Other antibodies are not recommended for use in the screening process to avoid unnecessary referrals of patients for endoscopic examination and to reduce healthcare costs.

Publisher

Remedium, Ltd.

Reference22 articles.

1. Боровик ТЭ, Захарова ИН, Потапов АС, Бельмер СВ, Хавкин АИ, Ревнова МО и др. Федеральные клинические рекомендации по оказанию медицинской помощи детям с целиакией. 2015. 22 с. Режим доступа: https://mosgorzdrav.ru/ru-RU/science/default/download/107.html.

2. Parfenov AI, Mayev IV, Baranov AA, Bakulin IG, Sabelnikova YeA, Krums LM et al. The Russian consensus on diagnosis and treatment of coeliac disease in children and adults. Almanac of Clinical Medicine. 2016;44(6):661–668. https://doi.org/10.18786/2072-0505-201644-6-661-688.

3. Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabó IR, Mearin ML, Phillips A, Shamir R et al. European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition guidelines for the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2012;54(1):136–160. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e31821a23d0.

4. Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Sz abó I, Kurppa K, Mearin ML, Ribes-Koninckx C et al. European Society Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Guidelines for Diagnosing Coeliac Disease 2020. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;70(1):141–156. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000002497.

5. Vriezinga SL, Auricchio R, Bravi E, Castillejo G, Chmielewska A, Crespo Escobar P et al. Randomized feeding intervention in infants at high risk for celiac disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(14):1304–1315. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1404172.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3