Clinical diversity and main directions of medical rehabilitation of dorsopathies of cervical-thoracic localization-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Clinical diversity and main directions of medical rehabilitation of dorsopathies of cervical-thoracic localization

Published:2023-08-18 Issue:13 Volume: Page:43-56
ISSN:2658-5790
Container-title:Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council
language:
Short-container-title:Medicinskij sovet

Author:

Yakovlev E. V.¹^ORCID,Zhivolupov S. A.²^ORCID,Gnevyshev E. N.³^ORCID,Achkasov E. E.⁴^ORCID,Butko D. Yu.⁵^ORCID,Vetrova T. V.⁶^ORCID,Davydov A. T.⁵^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Medical Center “Admiralteyskie Verfi”; Institute of Applied Psychoanalysis and Psychology of the University under the Interparliamentary Assembly of the EurAsEC; St Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

2. Military Medical Academy named after S.M. Kirov

3. Institute of Applied Psychoanalysis and Psychology of the University under the Interparliamentary Assembly of the EurAsEC; 3rd Military Hospital of the Russian National Guard Troops

4. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

5. St Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University

6. Institute of Applied Psychoanalysis and Psychology of the University under the Interparliamentary Assembly of the EurAsEC; St Petersburg University of Management Technologies and Economics

Abstract

Introduction. The high prevalence and increase in cases of seeking medical help for pain in dorsopathies determines the relevance of this problem. Among all the conditions included in the study of health care costs, non-specific musculoskeletal back pain ranks first in the world. A special place belongs to cervicothoracic dorsopathy (CTD), which are most common in developed countries and are characterized by a variety of clinical forms. In our opinion, a comprehensive method of treating CTD with the mandatory use of non-drug methods of therapy is the most optimal.Aim. Determination of the relationship between the pathogenetic form of CTD (verification of pain triggers) and a personalized method of treating patients, containing a combination of drug therapy and a rehabilitation complex of physiotherapeutic, psychotherapeutic effects.Materials and methods. Patients with CTD were included in the study. Neurological status assessment and biomechanical tests were carried out for accurate clinical verification of pathogenetic forms of CTD. Depending on the choice of treatment, respondents were stratified into comparable groups. The main group included patients to whom the original technique was applied, which implied a combination of drug therapy, a complex of rehabilitation physiotherapy and psychotherapeutic effects (n = 155), the control group (n = 65) – respondents who received a standard course of therapy. The statistical analysis included a comparative assessment of the intensity of pain syndrome, static-dynamic and reflex disorders before and after therapy.Results. Both methods have shown their effectiveness. The original technique more effectively reduced the intensity of pain syndrome, reduced the frequency of reflex disorders (p < 0.05), significantly reduced static-dynamic disorders in all subgroups (p < 0.05), while the standard significantly reduced them only in the subgroup with uncomplicated forms of CTD, without achieving a therapeutic effect in complicated CTD.Conclusion. The original method of therapy of patients with HCG has confirmed its effectiveness.

Publisher

Remedium, Ltd.

Subject

General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Komarov A.N. Complex therapy of spondyloarthrosis during rehabilitation of patients with dorsopathies in the attack-free interval using step therapy with serial forms of chondroitin sulfate. RMJ. 2022;(5):21–24. (In Russ.) Available at: https://www.rmj.ru/articles/nevrologiya/Kompleksnaya_terapiya_spondiloartroza_v_reabilitacii_pacientov_s_dorsopatiyami_v_meghpristupnyy_period_s_primeneniem_step-terapii_posledovatelynymi_formami_hondroitina_sulyfata/.

2. Yakovlev E.V., Gnevyshev E.N., Zhivolupov S.A., Smirnov A.A., Zhivolupova Yu.A., Eriskovskaya A.I., Ovsepyan A.L. Evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy of original and generic meloxicam in the treatment of acute neck pain. Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2021;(21-1):25–33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2021-21-1-25-33.

3. Yakovlev E.V., Zhivolupov S.A., Gnevyshev E.N., Vetrova T.V. General characteristics and features of the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of dorsopathies in clinical practice (literature review). Meditsinskiy Sovet. 2022;(23):68–77. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2022-16-23-68-77.

4. Dieleman J.L., Cao J., Chapin A., Chen C., Li Z., Liu A. et al. US Health Care Spending by Payer and Health Condition, 1996–2016. JAMA. 2020;323(9):863–884. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.0734.

5. Castelein B., Cools A., Parlevliet T., Cagnie B. Are chronic neck pain, scapular dyskinesis and altered scapulothoracic muscle activity interrelated?: A case-control study with surface and fine-wire EMG. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2016;31:136–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2016.10.008.