Affiliation:
1. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Abstract
This survey introduces up-to-date statistic data on women’s reproductive health considering current control methods. It includes literature analysis on the contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR) use. Evidential medicine proves that CVR is a long-standing, safe and effective birth control method. CVR usage definitely wins the battle against oral contraception and prolonged contraception methods. The survey includes current patients’ survey results concerning CVR usability particularly during sex. VR’s effect on vagina microbiota and cervix epithelium is also covered, considering the discussions on cervix cancer increase caused by long-term use of combined hormonal contraceptives. Recently, there has been some positive trend towards the protection of reproductive health. However, we have to admit that there are still many unresolved issues, in particular, unavailability of adequate family planning counselling services and advanced effective birth control methods. The pharmaceutical market is saturated with various birth control methods. A careful analysis of medical history details and test results makes it easy to choose the best possible and safe birth control method with due regard of the patients’ wishes. Bearing in mind the less pronounced systemic effect, ease of use, and a favourable safety profile, the choice of CVR as a birth control method seems to be the best solution for women
Reference48 articles.
1. Bearak J., Popinchalk A., Ganatra B., Moller A.B., Tunçalp Ö., Beavin C. et al. Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion: estimates from a comprehensive model for 1990–2019. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(9):e1152–e1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30315-6.
2. Smelov P.A., Nikitina S.Yu., Ageeva L.I., Alexandrova G.A., Golubev N.A., Kirillova G.N. et al. Healthcare in Russia. Moscow; 2021. 171 р. (In Russ.) Available at: https://rosstat.gov.ru/storage/mediabank/Zdravoohran-2021.pdf.
3. Kantorová V., Wheldon M.C., Ueffing P., Dasgupta A.N.Z. Estimating progress towards meeting women’s contraceptive needs in 185 countries: A Bayesian hierarchical modelling study. PLoS Med. 2020;17(2):e1003026. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003026.
4. Fan G.S., Ren M., Di W., Su P., Chang Q., Wu S. et al. Efficacy and safety of the contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing) compared with a combined oral contraceptive in Chinese women: a 1-year randomised trial. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2016;21(4):303–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2016.1186269.
5. Adanu R., Amaral E., Amy J.-J., Cameron Sh., Chipato T., Chou R. et al. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015. 192 р. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/181468/9789241549158_eng.pdf.