Abstract
Purpose: to describe the results of a regional study of subject and methodological skills of teachers of mathematics in the Krasnoyarsk Territory; highlight the professional difficulties of teachers in the subject area "Mathematics"; determine a list of corrective measures to eliminate the identified problems. Methods: theoretical (analysis of scientific literature on the problem of research, systematization and generalization of the results of scientific research) and empirical (ascertaining pedagogical experiment, analysis and interpretation of the results). Results: a program for diagnosing the subject and methodological skills of the professional activity of a mathematics teacher was developed. A diagnostic toolkit has been developed, which is based on the following principles: orientation to current educational results and modern requirements for the labor actions of a teacher, a system-activity approach for determining deficiencies in the field of methods of teaching mathematics, the possibility of designing an individual trajectory of a teacher's professional development based on the results of diagnostics. The analysis of the research results and recommendations for eliminating the identified professional deficiencies are presented. Scientific novelty: developed and substantiated an approach to the formation of control and measuring materials for the diagnosis of professional deficiencies in mathematics teachers. Practical significance: the main results and conclusions of the article can be used to create a regional system for monitoring professional deficits of mathematics teachers, as well as to develop modular training programs for teachers that provide personalized assistance to teachers in eliminating professional difficulties.
Publisher
Association "Professional Analytics of Autopoiesis Systems"
Reference26 articles.
1. Niemi H. (2015). Teacher professional development in Finland: Towards a more holistic approach. Psychology, Society and Education, 7(3), 278 - 294
2. PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. (2019). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
3. Айгунова О. А., Вачкова С. Н., Реморенко И. М., Семёнов А. Л., Тимонова Е. Н. Оценка профессиональной деятельности учителя в соответствии с профессиональным стандартом педагога // Вестник Московского городского педагогического университета. Серия: Педагогика и психология. 2017. № 2 (40). С. 8 - 23
4. Алтынникова Н. В., Музаев А. А. Оценка предметных и методических компетенций учителей: апробация единых федеральных оценочных материалов // Психологическая наука и образование. 2019. Т. 24. № 1. С. 31 - 41. doi: 10.17759/pse.2019240102
5. Геворкян Е. Н., Иоффе А. Н., Шалашова М. М. Диагностика педагога: от контрольного измерения к определению дефицитов для профессионального роста // Педагогика. 2020. № 1. С. 74 - 86.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献