Assessing the degree of development of dynamic capabilities theory: A systematic literature review

Author:

Gonzalez-Samaniego Arcadio1ORCID,A. Valenzo-Jimenez Marco2ORCID,Apolinar Martinez-Arroyo Jaime3ORCID,Antelmo Casanova Valencia Salvador4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ph.D., Postdoctoral Research, Department of Scientific Research Coordination, Faculty of Accounting and Administrative Sciences, Michoacan University of Saint Nicholas of Hidalgo

2. Ph.D., Research Professor, Department of Scientific Research Coordination, Faculty of Accounting and Administrative Sciences, Michoacan University of Saint Nicholas of Hidalgo

3. Ph.D., Research Professor, Department of Administration, Faculty of Accounting and Administrative Sciences, Michoacan University of Saint Nicholas of Hidalgo

4. Ph.D., Associate Professor, Coordination of Accreditation and Continuous Improvement Department, Faculty of Accounting and Administrative Sciences, Michoacan University of Saint Nicholas of Hidalgo

Abstract

Dynamic capabilities theory has become one of the most widely accepted theories of business strategy. The study aims to determine the degree of development of the dynamic capabilities theory. A meta-analysis was carried out through a bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review. Documents published in Scopus and Web of Science between 1997–2023 were analyzed using VOSviewer software. 49 documents met the analysis requirements, with a maximum of 11 published in 2022. Keyword co-occurrences were also analyzed. 222 were found, and 26 were selected with at least two co-occurrences. The documents were grouped into six clusters by these keywords and analyzed to determine the degree of development of the theory. The results have shown popularity among researchers in different science branches, indicating a high degree of development. However, the study noted a lack of theoretical consistency in elaborating constructs for measuring variables in empirical investigations. As a result, this leads to a lack of consistency and generalization of the results. Hence, the theory is not considered fully developed in terms of lack of internal coherence, falsifiability, and predictability. Tools for the empirical measurement of variables need to be theoretically and empirically validated to ensure their application in different contexts. The confrontation of results from validated measurement tools in diverse environments will contribute to developing dynamic capabilities theory. AcknowledgmentWe appreciate the support granted through the Postdoctoral Stays program by CONAHCYT.

Publisher

LLC CPC Business Perspectives

Subject

Business and International Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Information Systems and Management,Law,Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Insurance market transparency research trends: Bibliometric analysis;Insurance Markets and Companies;2023-12-27

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3