Systemic risk in the banking system: measuring and interpreting the results

Author:

Bezrodna Olena1ORCID,Ivanova Zoia2ORCID,Onyshchenko Yulia3ORCID,Lypchanskyi Volodymyr4ORCID,Rymar Serhii5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Ph.D., Senior Lecturer, Department of Banking, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

2. Ph.D., Senior Lecturer, Department of Marketing and Business Management, National University of “Kyiv-Mohyla Academy”

3. Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Banking, Odesa National Economic University

4. Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Economy, Management and Commercial Activity, Central-Ukrainian National Technical University

5. Senior Lecturer, Department of Pubic Science, Information and Archival Affairs, Central-Ukrainian National Technical University

Abstract

Highly concentrated banking system risks and the cumulative effect due to their accumulation act as a driver for improving the macro-prudential policy implemented by central banks. For this reason, an effectively and comprehensively assessed systemic risk in the banking system is declared an express condition for the early detection of its production sources and blocking of potential spreading channels, reducing the possible implementation. In light of this, the article develops an approach to the aggregated systemic risk assessment and interpretation of its results. The proposed approach is based on the considered influence exerted by financial risks of systemically important banks on the destabilized banking system and interconnections between banks in the context of the possible crisis impulse spreading. The following steps should be accomplished to form an aggregated systemic risk indicator in the banking system. Firstly, the differentiation of systemically important banks by the degree of their systemic importance; secondly, an integral assessment of the bank operation riskiness within certain bank groups; thirdly, the cumulative composition of the corresponding integral indicators, taking into account their weighting coefficients based on two criteria, namely values of the systemic importance indicator differentiating the bank groups, and the correlation of their risks. Interpreting the quantitative measurement results with regard to the systemic risk in the banking system is followed by the recommendations below: the systemic risk grading into high, medium and low levels and the respective definition of the threshold aggregated systemic risk indicator value which informs about the possible systemic crisis when approached; justification of the selected supervision regime types (strengthened, moderate or weakened) for systemically important banks, depending on the riskiness level specific for their operation and the systemic importance degree. The developed approach to measuring the systemic risk by means of constructing an aggregated indicator and interpreting the obtained results was being tested considering the financial risk indicators of the systemically important banks in Ukraine during 2009–2018.

Publisher

LLC CPC Business Perspectives

Subject

Finance,Management of Technology and Innovation,Marketing,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Law

Reference45 articles.

1. Measuring Systemic Risk

2. Acharya, V., Pedersen, L., Philippon, T., & Richardson, M. (2009). Regulating systemic risk (pp. 283-304). In Restoring financial stability: How to Repair a Failed System. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. - http://kadamaee.ir/payesh/books-tank/24/Acharya%20&%20Richardson%20(Eds)%20-%20Restoring%20Financial%20Stability;%20How%20to%20Repair%20a%20Failed%20System%20(2009).pdf

3. CoVaR

4. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2018). Global systemically important banks: revised assessment methodology and the higher loss absorbency requirement. - https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d445.pdf

5. Bezrodna, O. S., & Lesik, V. O. (2017). Теоретико-методичні аспекти оцінювання фінансової стабільності банківської системи [Teoretyko-metodychni aspekty otsiniuvannia finansovoi stabilnosti bankivskoi systemy]. Problemy Ekonomiky, 2, 251-263.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3