Financial and investment indicators for accelerating innovation development: Comparison of GII leaders and Ukraine

Author:

Dobrovolska Olena1ORCID,Sonntag Ralph2ORCID,Kachula Svitlana1ORCID,Hubaryk Olha3ORCID,Savanchuk Tetіana3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Doctor of Economics, Professor, Department of Finance, Banking and Insurance, Dnipro State Agrarian and Economic University, Ukraine

2. Professor, Dr., Rector of the University of Applied Sciences Stralsund, Germany

3. Ph.D. in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Accounting, Taxation and Management of Financial and Economic Security, Dnipro State Agrarian and Economic University, Ukraine

Abstract

The purpose of the paper is to determine the causal relationship between financial and investment indicators and the level of innovation development in GII leading countries and Ukraine. For a sample of 10 leaders in GII-2022 and Ukraine for 2011–2020, a correlation analysis was conducted based on the following indicators: the value of GII, foreign direct investment (net inflows), domestic credit to the private sector, ease of getting credit, protecting minority investors, and real interest rate. A positive relationship (with moderate/high strength) between innovation development and foreign direct investment has been proven in 7 out of 11 countries with a time lag of 0-2 years; domestic credit to the private sector – in 6 countries (lag of 0-3 years); and protecting minority investors – in 9 countries (lag of 0-2 years). For other indicators, the relationship is negative. Through VAR-modelling and Granger test, it is proven that the change in the value of foreign direct investment causes the change in the value of GII in 6 countries (bidirectional causality exists only in Ukraine); domestic credit to the private sector – in 6 countries, protecting minority investors and real interest rate – in 2 countries, and ease of getting credit – only in Switzerland. The results show that foreign direct investment and domestic credit to the private sector are the reasons for increasing the level of innovation development and have potentially the highest influence. In Ukraine, compared to GII leaders, only the factor of foreign direct investment is identified as a cause of innovation development.

Publisher

LLC CPC Business Perspectives

Subject

Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous),Economics and Econometrics,Finance

Reference67 articles.

1. The role of the university in achieving SDGs 4 and 7: a Ukrainian case

2. Testing for time-varying Granger causality

3. Institutional Principles of Intensifying the Innovative Development of Small and Medium Agribusiness

4. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., Freeman, J. R., Hitt, M. P., & W. Pevehouse, J. C. (2014). Time Series Analysis for the Social Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.

5. Boyarko, I. M., & Samusevych, Y. V. (2011). Role of intangible assets in company’s value creation. Actual Problems of Economics, 117(3), 86-94. - https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/bitstream-download/123456789/57863/5/Boiarko_Rol_nematerialnykh_aktyviv.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3