Management innovation practices to public sector organizations

Author:

Zidonis Zilvinas1,Bilinskyi Dmytro2ORCID,Nazyrov Karim3

Affiliation:

1. Ph.D., Associate Professor, Institute of Public Administration, Mykolas Romeris University

2. Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Yaroslav the Wise National Law Academy

3. Ph.D., Lecturer, Petro Vasylenko Kharkiv National Technical University of Agriculture

Abstract

The journey of modern management ideas to the public sector in post-socialist countries is expected to be hampered by several barriers. This paper aims to justify the need to implement management innovation practices for public sector organizations. The study was conducted using the method of typological analysis to determine the organization of managerial innovations; modeling method to determine the conceptual model and the position of the travel of management ideas to the country. As a result, a conceptual model was proposed, including elements of the internal and external control environment. Conclusions are given on the barriers that affect the choice and acceptance of management ideas. The article extends current research understanding of man-agreement innovation in the public sector in the region by specifically addressing the success, or failure, of the travel of modern management ideas to it and outlines key barriers to modern management adoption ideas in the public sector. AcknowledgmentThe research was funded by the Lithuanian Council of Research grant S-MOD-17-15.

Publisher

LLC CPC Business Perspectives

Subject

Strategy and Management,Business and International Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Information Systems and Management,Law,Sociology and Political Science,Public Administration

Reference50 articles.

1. Bason, C. (2018). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society. Bristol: Policy Press. - https://www.amazon.com/Leading-Public-Sector-Innovation-Co-creating/dp/1847426336

2. Birch, N., & Pooley, J. (1995). Changes in Russian quality management practices from 1989 to 1992. Management International Review, 35(3), 219-239. - https://www.questia.com/library/journal/1G1-17621396/changes-in-russian-quality-management-practices-from

3. Birkinshaw, J. M., & Mol, M. J. (2006). How management innovation happens. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47(4), 81-88. - https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-management-innovation-happens

4. Management Innovation

5. Boukamel, O., & Emery, Y. (2017). Evolution of organizational ambidexterity in the public sector and current challenges of innovation capabilities. The Innovation Journal, 22(2), 1-27. - https://www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/2017_22_2_2_boukamel_emergy-organization-ambidexterity.pdf

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3