A comparative analysis of value management practices between consumer and construction based firms

Author:

Ndu Vitalis1,Agbaeze Emmanuel2,Arisi-Nwugballa Emmanuel3,Okwo Henry4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Doctoral Researcher, Faculty of Business Administration, Department of Management, University of Nigeria

2. Ph.D., Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Business Administration, Department of Management, University of Nigeria

3. Ph.D., Senior Lecturer, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Management Sciences, Ebonyi State University

4. Ph.D. Student, Department of Management, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Nigeria

Abstract

The use of value management tools in non-management and non-business domains appears to be high, as exemplified by numerous studies conducted on the subject matter in the construction based disciplines, but understanding how such essential tool works in the consumer based domains seems lacking, this study becomes relevant in this regard. The aim of the study therefore is to understand how consumer based and construction based firms differ with regard to the use, focus and control of value management on a firm-by-firm basis, locational basis and on the basis of industrial typology. The researchers adopted a survey research design using a 16-item questionnaire instrument administered to 509 respondents across 10 firms: 5 being consumer and the other 5 being construction based firms. The formulated hypotheses were tested using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney’s U-test for non-parametric comparisons. The results obtained showed that consumer based firms ranked higher than construction based firms, both on a firm-by-firm (CSB = 256.9, CTB = 247.4, p@0.005; CSB=264.6, CTB = 234.3, p@0.011) for focus and control, respectively, and on an industrial type (CSB = 267.65, CTB = 235.93, p@0.017; CSB = 268.71, CTB = 234.33, p@0.009; CSB = 269.21, CTB = 233.58, p@0.007; CSB = 268.38, CTB = 234.83, p@0.011) comparison basis on actual usage, perceived usage, focus and control of value management, respectively. For the locational difference, there were no statistical significance. The study concludes that there is a case for a multidisciplinary study of value management as it appears more present in consumer than construction based firms.

Publisher

LLC CPC Business Perspectives

Subject

Strategy and Management,Business and International Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Information Systems and Management,Law,Sociology and Political Science,Public Administration

Reference36 articles.

1. Barriers to the adoption of value management in developing countries

2. Amoush, K. H. (2015). The impact of employing brainstorming strategy on improving writing performance of english major students at Balqa applied university in Jordan. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(35), 88-92. - https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1086359

3. Value management practice in South Africa: the built environment professions compared

4. Value management practice by South African quantity surveyors

5. Charles, I., Nasiri, F., & Hammad, A. (2017). Evaluating the impact of value management and buildability assessment on construction project delivery. - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317620678_Evaluating_the_Impact_of_Value_Management_and_Buildability_Assessment_on_Construction_Project_Delivery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3