Performance management at Ukrainian university: A case of the KPIs use

Author:

Shaulska Larysa1ORCID,Laktionova Oleksandra2ORCID,Nagornyak Tetyana3ORCID,Sereda Hanna4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Doctor of Economics, Professor, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

2. Doctor of Economics, Associate Professor, Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University

3. Doctor of Political Science, Professor, Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University

4. Ph.D., Associate Professor, Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University

Abstract

Implementing performance management systems, including the KPI (Key Performance Indicators) system, at the university level faces many difficulties. The study aims to determine the problems of formation and implementation of the system of KPIs at the HEIs (higher education institutions) level based on the case study. Methodologically the study is based on the analysis of the case of the KPI system implementation at Vasyl’ Stus Donetsk National University (Ukraine) using a 3-year project survey of managers and employees of structural units about self-analysis of deviations and perception of each performance indicator. The essential subjective factor – irrational participants’ behavior – is demonstrated, reflected in their resistance, fear, and lack of acceptance of innovations in assessment processes, which needs to delineate tools for effective KPI system implementation (reduction of its negative influence and growth of the personnel loyalty). The main organizational obstacles that reduce such a measurement system’s efficiency are incomprehensibility, difficulty of evaluation, non-influence or independency of indicators from the efforts of respondents, poor communication, and motivation to achieve them. The analysis results allowed providing the recommendations that could contribute to the formation of reflexive and active management culture in the strategic management system and a culture of productive dialogue through vertically and horizontally management interaction.

Publisher

LLC CPC Business Perspectives

Subject

Strategy and Management,Business and International Management,General Business, Management and Accounting,Information Systems and Management,Law,Sociology and Political Science,Public Administration

Reference20 articles.

1. Ballentine, H., & Eckles, J. (2009). Dueling scorecards: How two colleges utilize the popular planning method. Planning for Higher Education, 37(3), 27-35. - https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ840454

2. Successful Applications of the Balanced Scorecard in Higher Education

3. Committee of University Chairmen. (2004). A final report to the CUC on: Good practice in six areas of the governance of higher education institutions. - https://ucurhulgov.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/cuc-chems-final-report.pdf

4. Fitzgerald, L., Johnson, R. Brignall, T. J., & Sivelstro, R. (1991). Performance Measurement in Service Business. The Chartered Institute of Management Accountants, London. - https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283694495_Performance_Measurement_in_Service_Businesses

5. Ionescu, M. (2012). The balanced scorecard (BSC): Framework, implementation methodology and recommended application. Balanced Scorecard Romania.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3