Integrated evaluation of investment attractiveness in the context of economic sectors: Ukraine as a case study

Author:

Umantsiv Iurii1ORCID,Cherlenjak Ivan2ORCID,Prikhodko Volodymyr3ORCID,Sonko Yuliіa4ORCID,Shtan Maryna5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Doctor of Economics, Professor, Department of Economic Theory and Competition Policy, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics

2. Doctor of Public Administration, Professor, Department of Business-administration, Marketing and Management, Uzhhorod National University

3. Doctor of Economics, Professor, Department of Business-administration, Marketing and Management, Uzhhorod National University

4. Ph.D. in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of Public Management and Administration, Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics

5. Ph.D in Economics, Associate Professor, Department of International Economic Relations, National Academy of Management

Abstract

This study explores the evaluation of investment attractiveness of Ukraine’s economy. The following factors are analyzed: the social significance of the sector, the coefficient of support for the sectoral development, the coefficient of production efficiency, the index of fierce competition, and the inflation index. The results of applying the calculation of the average value of the weighting factor within a particular sector and the method of the sum of sets show that the most significant influence on the investment attractiveness of the economy sector are factors of economic efficiency and support of the sector by the state. The study is based on the development and calculation of an integrated indicator of sectoral attractiveness. This approach makes it possible to take into account a set of factors and more accurately describe the existing priorities of a particular sector of the economy. The conclusion is that that the most attractive sectors in Ukraine are industry, trade, transport and communications, as well as financial activities. The education sector remains the least attractive for investment. It is estimated that its attractiveness does not exceed 10% of the threshold. Unattractive for investments sectors will need special attention from the government. Correcting the current situation and attracting additional investment in such areas can significantly reduce the burden on the state budget. The findings of this investigation can be used in order to expand the existing tools for the formation of economic policy of Ukraine and improve the practice of evaluation of sectoral investment. AcknowledgementsThis article was prepared and funded within the research theme “Strategy of structural reorientation of Ukraine’s economy in the conditions of a pandemic” reg. No. 0121U109608 of Economic Theory and Competitive Policy Department of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics.

Publisher

LLC CPC Business Perspectives

Subject

Strategy and Management,Economics and Econometrics,Finance,Business and International Management

Reference26 articles.

1. Blank, I. A. (2001). IInvestitsionnyy menedzhment [Investment management]. (In Russian). Kyiv: Elha-N, Nika-Centre, Ukraine. - http://www.dut.edu.ua/uploads/l_1592_62002987.pdf

2. Borowicz, A., Kostyra, M., Dzierżanowski, M., Szultka, S. (Ed.)., & Wandałowski, M. (2016). The Investment Attractiveness of voivodships and the sub-regions in Poland 2016. Gdańsk: The Gdańsk Institute for Market Economics.

3. Dovhan, Y. (2015). Assessment of the investment attractiveness. Finance, accounting, banks, 1(21), 235-244. - http://socrates.vsau.edu.ua/repository/getfile.php/16950.pdf

4. Gliznutsa, M. Y. (2016). Vyznachennnia skladovykh ta otsinka innovatsiinoho potentsialu rehionu [Determination of the components and assessment of the region’s innovation potential]. Tekhnologicheskiy audit i reservy proizvodstva – Technology audit and production reserves, 3/5(29), 11-14. (In Ukrainian). - http://www.irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?I21DBN=LINK&P21DBN=UJRN&Z21ID=&S21REF=10&S21CNR=20&S21STN=1&S21FMT=ASP_meta&C21COM=S&2_S21P03=FILA=&2_S21STR=Tatrv_2016_3(5)__3

5. Globerman, S., & Shapiro, D. (1999). The Impact of Government Policies on Foreign Direct Investment: The Canadian Experience. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), 513-532. - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490081

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Turnover in EU Monetary Policy in a Crisis;ECONOMICS;2023-05-17

2. APPLICATION OF SYSTEM-FUNCTIONAL APPROACH IN MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISES;Scientific Notes of Taurida National V.I. Vernadsky University. Series: Economy and Management;2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3