Affiliation:
1. York College of Pennsylvania
Abstract
Data were obtained in Pennsylvania to examine referrals to juvenile courts in the Commonwealth for the 2021-2022 school year that include any felony, misdemeanor or summary offenses that occurred on school property. This study looked at the referrals to see if any of the individual domains of the Youth Level of Service Case Management Inventory 2.0 (YLS/CMI) had more of an effect on how the case was disposed of, which was defined as dismissed or handled informally, or formally adjudicated, in juvenile court. The research found that while the overall YLS risk score influenced juvenile court outcomes, only five of the eight individual domains of the YLS had a significant effect on how a case was processed in juvenile court, which calls into question how closely juvenile probation officers are following the instrument in their practice.
Publisher
National Partnership for Juvenile Services
Reference36 articles.
1. Andrews, D.A. & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th edition). Anderson Publishing.
2. Andrews, D.A. & Dowden C. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th edition). Anderson Publishing.
3. Borum, R. & Verhaagen, D. (2006). Assessing and managing violence risk in juveniles. The Guilford Press.
4. Borum, R., Bartel, P.A. & Forth, A. (2006). Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
5. Calley, N.G. & Richardson, E.M. (2011). Clinical prediction making: Examining influential factors related to clinical predictions of recidivism among juvenile offenders. Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling, 32, 2-15.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献