1. Bartos, T.T., Sando, S.K., Preston, T.M., Delzer, G.C., Lundgren, R.F., Nustad, R.A., Caldwell, R.R., Peterman, Z.E., Smith, B.D., Macek-Rowland, K.M., Bender, D.A., Frankforter, J.D., and Galloway, J.M., 2022, Potential effects of energy development on environmental resources of the Williston Basin in Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota—Water resources (ver. 1.1, October 2022): U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5070–C, 159 p., accessed November 20, 2022, at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20175070C.
2. California Council on Science and Technology, 2014, An independent scientific assessment of well stimulation in California: Sacramento, Calif., California Council on Science and Technology, 371 p., accessed September 13, 2017, at https://ccst.us/publications/2015/2015SB4-v1.php.
3. Carter, J.M., Macek-Rowland, K.M., Thamke, J.N., and Delzer, G.C., 2016, Estimating national water use associated with unconventional oil and gas development: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2016–3032, 6 p. [Also available at https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20163032.]
4. Council of Canadian Academies, 2014, Environmental impacts of shale gas extraction in Canada: Ottawa, Ontario, Council of Canadian Academies, 262 p., accessed June 22, 2022, at https://oilandgasinfo.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Environmental-Impacts-of-Shale-Gas-Extraction-in-Canada.pdf.
5. Davis, K.W., and Long, A.J., 2018a, Construction and calibration of a groundwater-flow model to assess groundwater availability in the uppermost principal aquifer systems of the Williston Basin, United States and Canada: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5158, 70 p., accessed November 20, 2022, at https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20175158.