Comparing the Indices predictive of the thermal injury outcome

Author:

Zhirkova E A.1ORCID,Spiridonova T. G.1ORCID,Sachkov A. V.1ORCID,Medvedev A. O.1ORCID,Eliseenkova E. I.1ORCID,Borisov I. G.1ORCID,Rogal M. L.1ORCID,Petrikov S. S.2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine

2. N.V. Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine; Russian University of Medicine

Abstract

Introduction. While developing the algorithms for diagnosis and treatment of patients with thermal injury, an injury outcome prediction index with the best predictive properties should be used.Aim. To compare the predictive properties of the Revised Frank Index and other specialized indices.Material and methods. A retrospective observational study included 307 patients with thermal injury, of whom 80 (26%) died. We compared the discriminatory ability, as well as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value, the accuracy of the diagnostic test in relation to predicting a fatal outcome for 8 specialized prediction indices: RFI, FI, Baux, RBS, PBI, ABSI, BOBI, and Ryan.Results. RFI showed the largest area under the ROC curve: 0.942 [0.913–0.971], other indices had a smaller area: FI 0.827 [0.768–0.886], Baux 0.860 [0.811–0.909], RBS  0.891 [0.848–0.933], PBI 0.893 [0.848–0.937], ABSI 0.838 [0.786–0.890], BOBI 0.865 [0.819–0.910], Ryan 0.816 [0.764–0.869]. The Ryan index had the highest sensitivity (95%), but its specificity (49%) was the lowest, and the proportion of false positive results was 60%. The RBS index had high sensitivity (84%) and specificity (80%), but the false positive rate was 40%. The RFI and PBI indices showed similar sensitivity (81%), however, the proportion of false positive results for RFI (23%) was lower than that of PBI (39%) and all other indices, and the RFI accuracy in predicting the outcome was the highest among the other indices, making 89%.Conclusion. The predictive properties of the Revised Frank Index are better than those of other specialized indices.

Publisher

IPO Association of Transplantologists

Reference27 articles.

1. Sheppard NN, Hemington-Gorse S, Shelley OP, Philp B, Dziewulski P. Prognostic scoring systems in burns: a review. Burns. 2011;37(8):1288–1295. PMID: 21940104 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2011.07.017

2. Frank G. [The "prognostic index" in burns for a more exact characterization of their degree of severity and a more reliable statistical evaluation]. Zentr albl Chir. 1960;85:272–277. [In German]. PMID: 13824499

3. Alekseev AA, Bobrovnikov AE, Bogdanov SB, Budkevich LI, Zhirkova EA, Kleuzovich AA, et al.; MZ RF; Ob"edinenie kombustiologov «Mir bez ozhogov». Ozhogi termicheskie i khimicheskie. Ozhogi solnechnye. Ozhogi dykhatel'nykh putey. Natsional'nye klinicheskie rekomendatsii. Moscow; 2021. (In Russ.).

4. Vikhriev BS, Burmistrov VM. (eds.) Ozhogi: rukovodstvo dlya vrachey. 2nd ed., revised and enlarged. Leningrad: Meditsina Publ.; 1986. (In Russ.).

5. Gerasimova LI, Nazarenko GI. (eds.) Termicheskie i radiatsionnye ozhogi: rukovodstvo dlya vrachey. 2nd ed., revised and enlarged. Moscow: Meditsina Publ.; 2005. (In Russ.).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3