Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Disparities in Indigenous reproductive health reflect Canada’s historic and ongoing colonial relationship with Indigenous peoples, which includes persistent inequities in health and social services. Reproductive justice scholars and activists advocate for intersectional approaches to enhancing Indigenous health equity that recognize land as a central determinant of wellness. The purpose of this study is to examine the association between relationships to land and wellness in a study of urban Indigenous women, two-spirit, trans, and gender diverse people of reproductive age in Canada’s largest city, Toronto.
Methods
Data were obtained from the cross-sectional Our Health Counts (OHC) Toronto study, which employed respondent-driven sampling methods (n = 323) and a community-directed comprehensive health assessment survey. In an exploratory analysis, we took an Indigenous reproductive justice theoretical approach to multivariable logistic regression.
Results
After adjusting for covariates, there was a statistically significant positive association between relationships to the land and wellness that was estimated with good precision (OR 3.7, 95% CI 2.5–5.3).
Conclusion
Our findings indicate that among urban Indigenous women, two-spirit, trans, and gender diverse people of reproductive age there is a positive association between feeling strong in their relationships to land and feeling balanced in the four domains of health (physical, spiritual, mental, and emotional). The community-based, community-directed design of OHC Toronto was congruent with a reproductive justice approach to research. Reproductive justice theories are adaptable to quantitative research on Indigenous reproductive health and can yield novel insights for supporting Indigenous wellness.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine
Reference29 articles.
1. Anderson, K. (2004). A recognition of being: reconstructing Native womanhood. Sumach Press.
2. Avery, L., Rotondi, N., McKnight, C., et al. (2019). Unweighted regression models perform better than weighted regression techniques for respondent-driven sampling data: results from a simulation study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 19, 202. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0842-f
3. Beckett, M., Firestone, M. A., McKnight, C. D., Smylie, J., & Rotondi, M. A. (2018). A cross-sectional analysis of the relationship between diabetes and health access barriers in an urban First Nations population in Canada. BMJ Open, 8(1), 1–9.
4. Danforth, Y. J. (2010). Reproductive justice: for real, for me, for you, for now. Resource document. Native Youth Sexual Health Network. http://www.nativeyouthsexualhealth.com/reproductivejustice.pdf
5. Greenland, P. J., & Robins, J. M. (1999). Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 10(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199901000-00008
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献