Occupational patterns of opioid-related harms comparing a cohort of formerly injured workers to the general population in Ontario, Canada
-
Published:2024-04-24
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0008-4263
-
Container-title:Canadian Journal of Public Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Can J Public Health
Author:
Carnide NancyORCID, Feng GregoryORCID, Song ChaojieORCID, Demers Paul A.ORCID, MacLeod Jill S.ORCID, Sritharan JeavanaORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Objectives
The role of work-related injuries as a risk factor for opioid-related harms has been hypothesized, but little data exist to support this relationship. The objective was to compare the incidence of opioid-related harms among a cohort of formerly injured workers to the general population in Ontario, Canada.
Methods
Workers’ compensation claimants (1983–2019) were linked to emergency department (ED) and hospitalization records (2006–2020). Incident rates of opioid-related poisonings and mental and behavioural disorders were estimated among 1.7 million workers and in the general population. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated, adjusting for age, sex, year, and region.
Results
Compared to the general population, opioid-related poisonings among this group of formerly injured workers were elevated in both ED (SIR = 2.41, 95% CI = 2.37–2.45) and hospitalization records (SIR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.50–1.59). Opioid-related mental and behavioural disorders were also elevated compared to the general population (ED visits: SIR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.83–1.89; hospitalizations: SIR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.38–1.47). Most occupations and industries had higher risks of harm compared to the general population, particularly construction, materials handling, processing (mineral, metal, chemical), and machining and related occupations. Teaching occupations displayed decreased risks of harm.
Conclusion
Findings support the hypothesis that work-related injuries have a role as a preventable risk factor for opioid-related harms. Strategies aimed at primary prevention of occupational injuries and secondary prevention of work disability and long-term opioid use are warranted.
Funder
Public Health Agency of Canada Ontario Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. Ahmad, F. B., Cisewski, J. A., Rossen, L. M., & Sutton, P. (2024). Provisional drug overdose death counts. National Center for Health Statistics. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/drug-overdose-data.htm. Accessed February 24, 2024. 2. Altekruse, S. F., Cosgrove, C. M., Altekruse, W. C., Jenkins, R. A., & Blanco, C. (2020). Socioeconomic risk factors for fatal opioid overdoses in the United States: Findings from the Mortality Disparities in American Communities Study (MDAC). PloS One, 15(1), e0227966. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227966 3. Applebaum, K. M., Asfaw, A., O’Leary, P. K., Busey, A., Tripodis, Y., & Boden, L. I. (2019). Suicide and drug-related mortality following occupational injury. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 62(9), 733–741. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.23021 4. Aram, J., Johnson, N. J., Lee, M. T., & Slopen, N. (2020). Drug overdose mortality is associated with employment status and occupation in the National Longitudinal Mortality Study. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 46(6), 769–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/00952990.2020.1820018 5. Asfaw, A., & Boden, L. I. (2020). Impact of workplace injury on opioid dependence, abuse, illicit use and overdose: A 36-month retrospective study of insurance claims. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 77(9), 648–653. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2020-106535
|
|