Capabilities, opportunities, motivations, and practices of different sector professionals working on community environments to improve health
-
Published:2023-11-02
Issue:
Volume:
Page:
-
ISSN:0008-4263
-
Container-title:Canadian Journal of Public Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Can J Public Health
Author:
Uche Uloma IgaraORCID, Stearns Jodie, Lee Karen
Abstract
Abstract
Objective
With rising healthcare costs in Canada from chronic conditions, individual behaviour change interventions in the clinical settings need to be complemented by a determinants of health approach, where multi-sector professionals assist in the creation of healthier community environments. This study sought to gain insights into capabilities, opportunities, motivations, and behaviours (COM-B) of Canadian multi-sector professionals for working together to improve built environments (BE) for health.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted with 61 multi-sector professionals. A 49-item questionnaire measuring constructs of COM-B for healthy BE practices was administered.
Results
Public health (PH) professionals were more motivated by personal interest/values in healthy BE and the presence of scientific evidence on BE design health impacts as compared with planning and policy/program development (PPD) professionals. Planning professionals were more likely to be motivated by healthy BE legislation/regulations/codes than PPD professionals. The practice of taking responsibility for the inclusion of healthy features into BE designs was reported more often by planning and other professionals compared to PH professionals. Results trended towards significance for opportunities as a predictor of healthy BE practices among all professionals.
Conclusion
Though motivators vary among different sector professionals, opportunities may be the most important driver of healthy BE practices and potentially a target to improve multi-sector professional practices in Canada. Future research should confirm findings of this first study of professional practice drivers guided by a theoretical behaviour change framework.
Funder
Public Health Agency of Canada
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine
Reference72 articles.
1. Alexander, K. E., Brijnath, B., & Mazza, D. (2014). Barriers and enablers to delivery of the Healthy Kids Check: An analysis informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework and COM-B model. Implementation Science, 9(1), 1–14. 2. Atkins, L., Francis, J., Islam, R., O’Connor, D., Patey, A., Ivers, N., Foy, R., Duncan, E. M., Colquhoun, H., & Grimshaw, J. M. (2017). A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implementation Science, 12(1), 1–18. 3. Bartley, K. F., Eisenhower, D. L., Harris, T. G., & Lee, K. K. (2019). Accelerometer and survey data on patterns of physical inactivity in New York City and the United States. Public Health Reports, 134(3), 293–299. 4. Baumann, A. A., Woodward, E. N., Singh, R. S., Adsul, P., & Shelton, R. C. (2022). Assessing researchers’ capabilities, opportunities, and motivation to conduct equity-oriented dissemination and implementation research, an exploratory cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1–13. 5. Bocarro, J. N., Casper, J., Henderson, K. A., Floyd, M. F., Moore, R., Kanters, M. A., Laven, K., & Edwards, M. B. (2009). Physical activity promotion in North Carolina: Perceptions of public park and recreation directors. Journal of Park & Recreation Administration, 27(1), 1–16.
|
|