Tracking emergency response actions during COVID-19 leads to development of an innovative public health evaluation tool
-
Published:2023-08-07
Issue:5
Volume:114
Page:737-744
-
ISSN:0008-4263
-
Container-title:Canadian Journal of Public Health
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Can J Public Health
Author:
Biro Suzanne, Scott KarenORCID, Nagy Emma, Slipp Nancy, Beck Kinsey, Catley Christina, Hart Ezra
Abstract
Abstract
Setting
Early in the pandemic, KFL&A Public Health needed a way to capture, organize, and display COVID-19-related events to be accountable for and evaluate our actions.
Intervention
We used accessible software (Microsoft Office 365 suite, Microsoft PowerBI) to develop a data collection and visualization system. The Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) developed a timeline and categorization approach for provincial and national COVID-related interventions, which was used to develop a regional version for local events using similar categories. We collected and displayed qualitative data alongside epidemiological data that allowed users to display different timelines of actions and outcomes and evaluate our response.
Outcomes
In developing the timeline, we took stock of the information and data we wanted to collect, sort, and display locally. Next, we collected information on response actions, case and contact tracing, and staffing changes in a database that we displayed on a timeline. We included CIHI’s data set to provide insight into pandemic response across all jurisdictions.
Implications
Our timeline tool has many advantages for public health authorities beyond responding to a rapidly evolving emergency. By collecting information on events as they occur, decisions and actions are documented that may otherwise be overlooked. This enables decision-makers to visualize the impact of public health actions on health outcomes over time. The tool is completely customizable and scalable depending on the project scope and we plan to apply this method to other public health programming. Finally, we include lessons learned from quickly developing these tools in a real-time pandemic setting, both locally at KFL&A Public Health and nationally at CIHI.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,General Medicine
Reference11 articles.
1. Association of Local Public Health Agencies. (2022). Public health resilience in Ontario. Clearing the backlog, resuming routine programs, and maintaining an effective COVID-19 response. Association of Local Public Health Agencies. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.alphaweb.org/resource/collection/822EC60D-0D03-413E-B590-AFE1AA8620A9/alPHa_PH_Resilience_Report_Final_Jan2022.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2022. 2. Bozorgmehr, K., Rohleder, S., Duwendag, S., Mohsenpour, A., Saint, V., Gold, A. W., Kaur, S., Nutsch, N., & Costa, D. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic policy monitor (COV-PPM) - European level tracking data of non-pharmaceutical interventions. Data in Brief, 39, Article 107579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2021.107579 3. Canadian Institute for Health Information. (2022). Canadian COVID-19 Intervention Timeline. https://www.cihi.ca/en/canadian-covid-19-intervention-timeline. Accessed 17 Nov 2022. 4. Henry, B., on behalf of the Canadian Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Task Group. (2019). Canadian pandemic influenza preparedness: Public health measures strategy. Canada Communicable Disease Report, 45(6), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.14745/ccdr.v45i06a03 5. Hale, T., Angrist, N., Goldszmidt, R., Kira, B., Petherick, A., Phillips, T., Webster, S., Cameron-Blake, E., Hallas, L., Majumdar, S., & Tatlow, H. (2021). A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker). Nature Human Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01079-8
|
|