Abstract
AbstractSocial risk assessments and case studies of labour conditions in food production primarily focus on specific subpopulations, regions and commodities. To date, research has not systematically assessed labour conditions against international standards across diverse, complex food products. Here we combine data on production, trade, labour intensity and qualitative risk coding to quantitatively assess the risk of forced labour embedded in the US land-based food supply, building on our previous assessment of fruits and vegetables. We demonstrate that animal-based proteins, processed fruits and vegetables, and discretionary foods are major contributors to forced labour risk and that 62% of total forced labour risk stems from domestic production or processing. Our findings reveal the widespread risk of forced labour present in the US food supply and the necessity of collaborative action across all countries—high, middle and low income—to eliminate reliance on labour exploitation.
Funder
Tufts University Springboard program, Amazon.com, Inc., Interdisciplinary Research Innovation Fund (RAFINS) at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University
Nottingham Research Fellowship, University of Nottingham
Interdisciplinary Research Innovation Fund (RAFINS) at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University; Nottingham Research Fellowship, University of Nottingham
Amazon.com, Inc., Interdisciplinary Research Innovation Fund (RAFINS) at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University
Amazon.com, Inc.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Agronomy and Crop Science,Animal Science and Zoology,Food Science
Reference73 articles.
1. Fanzo, J. et al. Viewpoint: rigorous monitoring is necessary to guide food system transformation in the countdown to the 2030 global goals. Food Policy 104, 102163 (2021).
2. Béné, C., Fanzo, J., Achicanoy, H. A. & Lundy, M. Can economic development be a driver of food system sustainability? Empirical evidence from a global sustainability index and a multi-country analysis. PLoS Sustain. Transform. 1, e0000013 (2022).
3. Chaudhary, A., Gustafson, D. & Mathys, A. Multi-indicator sustainability assessment of global food systems. Nat. Commun. 9, 848 (2018).
4. The Meanings of Forced Labour (International Labour Organization, 2014); https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/forced-labour/news/WCMS_237569/lang–en/index.htm
5. Global Estimates of Modern Slavery: Forced Labour and Forced Marriage (International Labour Organization, Walk Free Foundation & International Organization for Migration, 2022); http://www.ilo.org/global/topics/forced-labour/publications/WCMS_854733/lang--en/index.htm
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献