6-[18F]fluoro-l-DOPA Metabolism in Living Human Brain: A Comparison of Six Analytical Methods

Author:

Hoshi Hiroaki1,Kuwabara Hiroto1,Léger Gabriel1,Cumming Paul1,Guttman Mark1,Gjedde Albert1

Affiliation:

1. Positron Imaging Laboratories, McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute and Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Abstract

In 11 normal volunteers and six patients with Parkinson's disease, we compared six different analyses of dopaminergic function with l-3,4-dihydroxy-6-[18F]fluorophenylalanine (FDOPA) and positron emission tomography (PET). The caudate nucleus, putamen, and several reference regions were identified in PET images, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The six analyses included two direct determinations of DOPA decarboxylase activity ( kD3, k*3), the slope–intercept plot based on plasma concentration ( K), two slope–intercept plots based on tissue content ( kr3, ks3), and the striato–occipital ratio [ R( T)]. For all analyses, the difference between two groups of subjects (normal volunteers and patients with Parkinson's disease) was larger in the putamen than in the caudate. For the caudate nucleus, the DOPA decarboxylase activity ( kD3, k*3), tissue slope–intercept plots ( kr3, ks3), and striato–occipital ratio [ R( T)] analyses significantly discriminated between the normal volunteers and the patients with Parkinson's disease ( p < 0.005) [with least significance for k*3( p < 0.05)], while the plasma slope–intercept plot ( K) failed to do so. For the putamen, the values for kD3, k*3, K, kr3, ks3and R( T) of normal volunteers were significantly higher than those of patients ( p < 0.005) [with least significance for K ( p < 0.025)]. Linear correlations were significant between kD3and ks3; kD3and kr3; kD3and R( T); and kD3and k*3, in this order of significance. We found no correlation between kD3and K values in the caudate nucleus.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Clinical Neurology,Neurology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3