Abstract
AbstractAs natural disasters grow in frequency and intensity with climate change, limiting the populations and properties in harm’s way will be key to adaptation. This study evaluates one approach to discouraging development in risky areas—eliminating public incentives for development, such as infrastructure investments, disaster assistance and federal flood insurance. Using machine learning and matching techniques, we examine the Coastal Barrier Resources System (CBRS), a set of lands where these federal incentives have been removed. We find that the policy leads to lower development densities inside designated areas, increases development in neighbouring areas, reduces flood damages and alters local demographics. Our results suggest that the CBRS generates substantial savings for the federal government by reducing flood claims in the National Flood Insurance Program, while increasing the property tax base in coastal counties.
Funder
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference57 articles.
1. Branham, J., Kaza, N., BenDor, T. K., Salvesen, D. & Onda, K. Removing federal subsidies from high-hazard coastal areas slows development. Front. Ecol. Environ. 20, 500–506 (2022).
2. Onda, K., Branham, J., BenDor, T. K., Kaza, N. & Salvesen, D. Does removal of federal subsidies discourage urban development? An evaluation of the US Coastal Barrier Resources Act. PloS ONE 15, e0233888 (2020).
3. Bagstad, K. J., Stapleton, K. & D’Agostino, J. R. Taxes, subsidies, and insurance as drivers of United States coastal development. Ecological Economics 63, 285–298 (2007).
4. Cordes, J. J. & Yezer, A. M. J. In harm’s way: does federal spending on beach enhancement and protection induce excessive development in coastal areas? Land Econ. 74, 128–145 (1998).
5. Kousky, C. & Olmstead, S. M. Induced Development in Risky Locations: Fire Suppression and Land Use in the American West (Resources for the Future, 2010).