Identifying species likely threatened by international trade on the IUCN Red List can inform CITES trade measures

Author:

Challender Daniel W. S.ORCID,Cremona Patricia J.ORCID,Malsch Kelly,Robinson Janine E.,Pavitt Alyson T.,Scott Janet,Hoffmann Rachel,Joolia Ackbar,Oldfield Thomasina E. E.,Jenkins Richard K. B.,Conde Dalia A.ORCID,Hilton-Taylor CraigORCID,Hoffmann MichaelORCID

Abstract

AbstractOverexploitation is a major threat to biodiversity and international trade in many species is regulated through the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). However, there is no established method to systematically determine which species are most at risk from international trade to inform potential trade measures under CITES. Here, we develop a mechanism using the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of Threatened Species to identify species that are likely to be threatened by international trade. Of 2,211 such species, CITES includes 59% (1,307 species), leaving two-fifths overlooked and in potential need of international trade regulation. Our results can inform deliberations on potential proposals to revise trade measures for species at CITES Conference of the Parties meetings. We also show that, for taxa with biological resource use documented as a threat, the number of species threatened by local and national use is four times greater than species likely threatened by international trade. To effectively address the overexploitation of species, interventions focused on achieving sustainability in international trade need to be complemented by commensurate measures to ensure that local and national use and trade of wildlife is well-regulated and sustainable.

Funder

UKRI GCRF

Environment Agency Abu Dhabi, Rufford Foundation

Rufford Foundation

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference45 articles.

1. Maxwell, S. L., Fuller, R. A., Brooks, T. M. & Watson, J. E. M. The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers. Nature 536, 143–145 (2016).

2. Cooney, R. et al. The Trade in Wildlife: A Framework to Improve Biodiversity and Livelihood Outcomes (International Trade Centre, 2015).

3. Cheng, S. et al. Mapping the Evidence: Effectiveness of International Wildlife Trade Practices and Policies (Conservation International, 2017).

4. The CITES Species. CITES https://cites.org/eng/disc/species.php (2019).

5. ’t Sas-Rolfes, M., Challender, D. W. S., Hinsley, A., Veríssimo, D. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. Illegal wildlife trade: scales, processes, and governance. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 44, 201–228 (2020).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3