Abstract
AbstractBiodiversity conservation is increasingly being recognized as an important co-benefit in climate change mitigation programmes that use nature-based climate solutions. However, the climate co-benefits of biodiversity conservation interventions, such as habitat protection and restoration, remain understudied. Here we estimate the forest carbon storage co-benefits of a national policy intervention for tiger (Panthera tigris) conservation in India. We used a synthetic control approach to model avoided forest loss and associated carbon emissions reductions in protected areas that underwent enhanced protection for tiger conservation. Over a third of the analysed reserves showed significant but mixed effects, where 24% of all reserves successfully reduced the rate of deforestation and the remaining 9% reported higher-than-expected forest loss. The policy had a net positive benefit with over 5,802 hectares of averted forest loss, corresponding to avoided emissions of 1.08 ± 0.51 MtCO2 equivalent between 2007 and 2020. This translated to US$92.55 ± 43.56 million in ecosystem services from the avoided social cost of emissions and potential revenue of US$6.24 ± 2.94 million in carbon offsets. Our findings offer an approach to quantitatively track the carbon sequestration co-benefits of a species conservation strategy and thus help align the objectives of climate action and biodiversity conservation.
Funder
NUS Research Scholarship
National Research Foundation Singapore
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Reference58 articles.
1. Pettorelli, N. et al. Time to integrate global climate change and biodiversity science‐policy agendas. J. Appl. Ecol. 58, 2384–2393 (2021).
2. Almond, R. E., Grooten, M. & Peterson, T. (eds) Living Planet Report 2020. Bending the Curve of Biodiversity Loss (World Wildlife Fund, 2020).
3. Ripple, W. et al. World scientists' warning of a climate emergency. BioScience 70, 8–12 (2020).
4. Griscom, B. W. et al. Natural climate solutions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11645–11650 (2017).
5. Lee, D.-H., Kim, D.-H. & Kim, S.-I. Characteristics of forest carbon credit transactions in the voluntary carbon market. Clim. Policy 18, 235–245 (2018).
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献