Abstract
AbstractThe regulation of water companies (WCs) is essential to protect the interests of citizens, as companies are natural monopolies. Consequently, several methodological approaches are applied by water regulators to benchmark the performance of WCs, with data envelopment analysis (DEA) being one of the most widely applied. However, traditional DEA models allocate different weights to variables considered in efficiency assessments of each WC. By contrast, this study proposes and applies a common set weights (CSW) DEA model to a sample of Chilean WCs. The results showed that the DEA-CSW approach had greater discriminatory capacity compared to traditional DEA techniques. Moreover, weights allocated to input and output variables involved in efficiency assessment diverged among WCs when the traditional DEA model was employed. By contrast, the DEA-CSW approach generated reliable ranking of WCs based on their efficiency scores, thus facilitating the regulatory decision-making process.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Pollution,Waste Management and Disposal,Water Science and Technology
Reference31 articles.
1. UN (United Nations). Human Right to Water and Sanitation. https://www.unwater.org/water-facts/human-rights/ (2010).
2. UN (United Nations) Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html (2015).
3. Molinos-Senante, M., Maziotis, A. & Sala-Garrido, R. Evaluating trends in the performance of Chilean water companies: impact of quality of service and environmental variables. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27, 13155–13165 (2020).
4. IWA. The Lisbon Charter (IWA Publishing, 2015).
5. Cabrera, E. Jr., Estruch-Juan, E. & Molinos-Senante, M. Adequacy of DEA as a regulatory tool in the water sector. the impact of data uncertainty. Environ. Sci. Policy 85, 155–162 (2018).
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献