Including water quality monitoring in rural water services: why safe water requires challenging the quantity versus quality dichotomy

Author:

Nowicki SaskiaORCID,Koehler Johanna,Charles Katrina J.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe need to increase drinking water quality monitoring in rural sub-Saharan Africa is widely recognised. Rural water service providers (RWSPs) may be positioned to include water quality monitoring in their activities; however, it is important that water safety activities do not compromise cooperation between the RWSP, bureaucracy, and communities. Using dilemma analysis, drawing on an institutional experiment engaging 76 stakeholders, we find that conceptualising water quality versus quantity as a dichotomy delays progress on safe water. This false dichotomy makes it more difficult to deliver water safety improvements due to contrasting assumptions about the importance of quality; risks associated with not being able to act; and unclear divisions of responsibility. Monitoring water quality can be a threat to stakeholders and stakeholder cooperation; however, this may be mitigated by including supported water safety planning in the technical and institutional design of rural water projects at their conception.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Pollution,Waste Management and Disposal,Water Science and Technology

Reference51 articles.

1. Government of Kenya. The Water Act: No. 43 of 2016. 164 (Government of Kenya, 2016).

2. Gerlach, E. Regulating Rural Water Supply Services: A Comparative Review of Existing and Emerging Approaches with a Focus on GIZ Partner Countries (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, 2019).

3. WASREB. Guideline For Provision of Water and Sanitation Services in Rural and Underserved Areas in Kenya (2019).

4. JMP. Progress on Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene: 2017 Update and SDG Baselines. (2017).

5. JMP. Progress on household drinking water, sanitation and hygiene 2000–2017. Special focus on inequalities (2019).

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3