Abstract
Abstract
Background
Household air pollution (HAP) is a major risk factor of non-communicable diseases, causing millions of premature deaths each year in developing nations. Populations living at high altitudes are particularly vulnerable to HAP and associated health outcomes.
Objectives
This study aims to explore the relationships between activity patterns, HAP, and an HAP biomarker among 100 Himalayan nomadic households during both cooking and heating-only periods.
Methods
Household CO was monitored in 100 rural homes in Qinghai, China, at 3500 m on the Himalayan Plateau among Himalayan nomads. Carboxyhemoglobin (COHb) was used as a biomarker to assess exposure among 100 male and 100 female heads of household. Linear mixed-effects models were used to explore the relationship between COHb and activity patterns.
Results
Cooking periods were associated with 7 times higher household CO concentrations compared with heating periods (94 ± 56 ppm and 13 ± 11 ppm, respectively). Over the three-day biomarker-monitoring period in each house, 99% of subjects had at least one COHb measurement exceeding the WHO safety level of 2%. Cooking was associated with a 32% increase in COHb (p < 0.001).
Impact statement
This study on household air pollution (HAP) in high-altitude regions provides important insights into the exposure patterns of nomadic households in Qinghai, China. The study found that cooking is the primary factor influencing acute carbon monoxide (CO) exposure among women, while heating alone is sufficient to elevate CO exposure above WHO guidelines. The results suggest that cooking-only interventions have the potential to reduce HAP exposure among women, but solutions for both cooking and heating may be required to reduce COHb to below WHO guidelines. This study’s findings may inform future interventions for fuel and stove selection to reduce HAP and exposure among other populations.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference31 articles.
1. Smith, KR, Bruce, N, Balakrishnan, K, Adair-Rohani, H, Balmes, J, Chafe, Z, et al. Millions dead: how do we know and what does it mean? Methods used in the comparative risk assessment of household air pollution. In: Annual Review of Public Health. Annual Reviews Inc. 2014. 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182356.
2. World Health Organization., Burden of disease from household air pollution for 2016 Description of method. 2018.
3. U.S. EPA. Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) for Carbon Monoxide (Final Report, Jan 2010). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-09/019F, 2010.
4. Zhang, J, Mauzerall, DL, Zhu, T, Liang, S, Ezzati, M, Remais, JV, Environmental health in China: progress towards clean air and safe water. Lancet. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60062-1.
5. Zhang, LX, Wang, CB, Yang, ZF, Chen, B. Carbon emissions from energy combustion in rural China. In: Procedia Environmental Sciences. Elsevier, 2010. 980–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.110.