Abstract
Abstract
Background
Children may be exposed to harmful chemicals from their products. Accurate exposure factors are critical for exposure assessment of children’s products. Product usage pattern parameters are relatively limited compared with the chemical concentration, children’s physiological and behavioral parameters.
Objective
The aim of this study was to determine nationally representative Korean exposure factors for the usage patterns of children’s products by sex, age, and season.
Methods
Using proportional quota sampling, a survey of 10,000 households with children aged 0–12 years was conducted twice, once in summer and winter. The children’s ages were divided into four groups: infant (0–2 years old), toddler (3–6), lower-grade elementary student (7–9), and higher-grade elementary student (10–12). Data on exposure factors such as use rate, use frequency, and use duration of 57 children’s products were collected.
Results
The 57 products were classified into five categories: baby products (13), toys (12), daily products (10), sporting goods (8), and stationery (14). The use rates of products in the daily products and stationery category were >90% in both seasons. Two of the 57 products showed significant sex differences in all three exposure factors (p < 0.001). Twenty-five of the 44 non-baby products showed significant age differences for all three exposure factors. Twenty-three of the 57 products varied significantly with season for all three exposure factors.
Impact
This study generated a nationally representative exposure factor database for the usage patterns of children’s products in Korea. The exposure factors for 57 children’s products were investigated through twice survey with quota sampling with each 10,000 children nationwide. Sex, age, and seasonal differences for children’s products were identified. These accurate exposure factors by sex, age, and season can be used as input parameters for refined exposure assessment.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference44 articles.
1. Negev M, Berman T, Reicher S, Balan S, Soehl A, Goulden S, et al. Regulation of chemicals in children’s products: how U.S. and EU regulation impacts small markets. Sci Total Environ. 2018;616-617:462–71.
2. Tsuji JS, Garry MR, Perez V, Chang ET. Low-level arsenic exposure and developmental neurotoxicity in children: a systematic review and risk assessment. Toxicology. 2015;337:91–107.
3. Van Engelen JGM, van der Zee Park M, Janssen PJCM, Oomen AG, Brandon EFA, Bouma K, et al. Chemicals in toys: a general methodology for assessment of chemical safety of toys with a focus on elements. RIVM report 320003001. 2008. http://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/320003001.pdf.
4. Aurisano N, Huang L, Canals LMI, Jolliet O, Fantke P. Chemicals of concern in plastic toys. Environ Int. 2021;146:106194.
5. Ionas AC, Dirtu AC, Anthonissen T, Neels H, Covaci A. Downsides of the recycling process: harmful organic chemicals in children’s toys. Environ Int. 2014;65:54–62.