Abstract
Abstract
Background
The effects of ultraviolet (UV) filters in the aquatic environment have been well studied, but environmental exposures remain unclear and understudied. Consumer usage directly influences the amount of sunscreen products, and subsequently UV filters, potentially released into the environment.
Objective
To conduct a literature review of previous research into sunscreen application thickness, develop a questionnaire protocol designed to semi-quantify sunscreen usage by US consumers, and conduct a large-scale survey to determine a sunscreen application thickness (to face and body) that is more refined than conservative defaults. The United States Food & Drug Administration (US FDA) recommends a sunscreen application rate of 2 mg/cm2. This value is typically used as a worst-case assumption in environmental exposure assessments of UV filters.
Methods
Designed a novel approach to estimate lotion sunscreen application thickness using an online questionnaire protocol employing visual references and self-reported height and weight of the respondents. A literature review was also conducted to collect historical sunscreen usage.
Results
Over 9000 people were surveyed in the US, and after the dataset was refined, their sunscreen application thickness was estimated based on calculated body surface area and reported sunscreen amounts. The mean and median values for survey respondents are 3.00 and 1.78 mg/cm2, respectively, for facial application thickness and 1.52 and 1.35 mg/cm2, respectively, for body application thickness. Earlier research from 1985–2020 reported 36 of the 38 values are below the US FDA’s recommended application thickness of 2 mg/cm2 (range 0.2–5 mg/cm2).
Impact statement
This web-based survey is the first of its kind, designed specifically to quantify sunscreen application in a large and diverse set of consumers. This method provides a greater reach to larger populations thus enabling more granular data analysis and understanding. Exposure assessments of sunscreen ingredients typically use conservative parameters. These data can refine those assessments and allow for more informed and science-based risk management decisions.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pollution,Toxicology,Epidemiology
Reference36 articles.
1. Armstrong B, Baverstock K, Brenner D, Cardis E, Green A, Guilmette R, et al. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Volume 100. A review of human carcinogens. Part D: radiation. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2012.
2. Moloney FJ, Collins S, Murphy GM. Sunscreens: safety, efficacy and appropriate use. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3:185–91. https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200203030-00005.
3. USFDA. Labeling and effectiveness testing; sunscreen drug products for over-the-counter human use. Final rule. United States; 2011.
4. Carve M, Nugegoda D, Allinson G, Shimeta J. A systematic review and ecological risk assessment for organic ultraviolet filters in aquatic environments. Environ Pollut. 2021;268:115894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115894.
5. Mitchelmore CL, Burns EE, Conway A, Heyes A, Davies IA. A critical review of organic ultraviolet filter exposure, hazard, and risk to corals. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4948.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献