Abstract
AbstractAuthority, an institutionalized form of social power, is one of the defining features of the large-scale societies that evolved during the Holocene. Religious and political authority have deep histories in human societies and are clearly interdependent, but the nature of their relationship and its evolution over time is contested. We purpose-built an ethnographic dataset of 97 Austronesian societies and used phylogenetic methods to address two long-standing questions about the evolution of religious and political authority: first, how these two institutions have coevolved, and second, whether religious and political authority have tended to become more or less differentiated. We found evidence for mutual interdependence between religious and political authority but no evidence for or against a long-term pattern of differentiation or unification in systems of religious and political authority. Our results provide insight into how political and religious authority have worked synergistically over millennia during the evolution of large-scale societies.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Social Psychology
Reference58 articles.
1. Uphoff, N. Distinguishing power, authority and legitimacy: taking Max Weber at his word by using resources-exchange analysis. Polity 22, 295–322 (1989).
2. Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R. Institutional evolution in the Holocene: the rise of complex societies. Proc. Br. Acad. 110, 197–234 (2001).
3. Kosse, K. Group size and societal complexity: thresholds in the long-term memory. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 9, 275–303 (1990).
4. Johnson, A. W. & Earle, T. K. The Evolution of Human Societies: From Foraging Group to Agrarian State (Stanford Univ. Press, 2000).
5. Woodburn, J. Egalitarian societies. Man 17, 431–451 (1982).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献