Psychological inoculation strategies to fight climate disinformation across 12 countries

Author:

Spampatti TobiaORCID,Hahnel Ulf J. J.ORCID,Trutnevyte EvelinaORCID,Brosch TobiasORCID

Abstract

AbstractDecades after the scientific debate about the anthropogenic causes of climate change was settled, climate disinformation still challenges the scientific evidence in public discourse. Here we present a comprehensive theoretical framework of (anti)science belief formation and updating to account for the psychological factors that influence the acceptance or rejection of scientific messages. We experimentally investigated, across 12 countries (N = 6,816), the effectiveness of six inoculation strategies targeting these factors—scientific consensus, trust in scientists, transparent communication, moralization of climate action, accuracy and positive emotions—to fight real-world disinformation about climate science and mitigation actions. While exposure to disinformation had strong detrimental effects on participants’ climate change beliefs (δ = −0.16), affect towards climate mitigation action (δ = −0.33), ability to detect disinformation (δ = −0.14) and pro-environmental behaviour (δ = −0.24), we found almost no evidence for protective effects of the inoculations (all δ < 0.20). We discuss the implications of these findings and propose ways forward to fight climate disinformation.

Funder

Services Industriels de Genève (SIG) Chem. du Château-Bloch 2, 1219 Le Lignon, CH

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Behavioral Neuroscience,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Social Psychology

Reference216 articles.

1. IPCC Climate Change 1995: Synthesis Report (eds Bolin, B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1995).

2. IPCC Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).

3. Cook, J. in Research Handbook on Communicating Climate Change (eds Holmes, D. C. & Richardson, L. M.) 62–78 (Edward Elgar, 2020).

4. Lynas, M. et al. Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 114005 (2021).

5. Myers, K. F. et al. Consensus revisited: quantifying scientific agreement on climate change and climate expertise among Earth scientists 10 years later. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 104030 (2021).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3