Prognostic value of desmoplastic reaction characterisation in stage II colon cancer: prospective validation in a Phase 3 study (SACURA Trial)
-
Published:2021-01-07
Issue:6
Volume:124
Page:1088-1097
-
ISSN:0007-0920
-
Container-title:British Journal of Cancer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Br J Cancer
Author:
Ueno HidekiORCID, Ishiguro Megumi, Nakatani Eiji, Ishikawa Toshiaki, Uetake HiroyukiORCID, Murotani Kenta, Matsui Shigeyuki, Teramukai Satoshi, Sugai Tamotsu, Ajioka Yoichi, Maruo Hirotoshi, Kotaka Masahito, Tsujie Masaki, Munemoto Yoshinori, Yamaguchi Takashi, Kuroda Hisashi, Fukunaga Mutsumi, Tomita Naohiro, Sugihara Kenichi
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The characterisation of desmoplastic reaction (DR) has emerged as a new, independent prognostic determinant in colorectal cancer. Herein, we report the validation of its prognostic value in a randomised controlled study (SACURA trial).
Methods
The study included 991 stage II colon cancer patients. DR was classified by the central review as Mature, Intermediate or Immature based on the presence of hyalinised collagen bundles and myxoid stroma at the desmoplastic front. All clinical and pathological data, including DR characterisations, were prospectively recorded and analysed 5 years after the completion of the registration.
Results
The five-year relapse-free survival (RFS) rate was the highest in the Mature group (N = 638), followed by the Intermediate (N = 294) and Immature groups (N = 59). Multivariate analysis revealed that DR classification was an independent prognostic factor, and based on Harrell’s C-index, the Cox model for predicting RFS was significantly improved by including DR. In the conditional inference tree analysis, DR categorisation was the first split factor for predicting RFS, followed by T-stage, microsatellite instability status and budding.
Conclusions
Histological categorisation of DR provides important prognostic information that could contribute to the efficient selection of stage II colon cancer patients who would benefit from postoperative adjuvant therapy.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference52 articles.
1. Quasar Collaborative Group, Gray, R., Barnwell, J., McConkey, C., Hills, R. K., Williams, N. S. et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation in patients with colorectal cancer: a randomised study. Lancet 370, 2020–2029 (2007). 2. Wilkinson, N. W., Yothers, G., Lopa, S., Costantino, J. P., Petrelli, N. J. & Wolmark, N. Long-term survival results of surgery alone versus surgery plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for stage II and stage III colon cancer: pooled analysis of NSABP C-01 through C-05 baseline from which to compare modern adjuvant trials. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 17, 959–966 (2010). 3. Schrag, D., Rifas-Shiman, S., Saltz, L., Bach, P. B. & Begg, C. B. Adjuvant chemotherapy use for medicare beneficiaries with stage II colon cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 20, 3999–4005 (2002). 4. O’Connor, E. S., Greenblatt, D. Y., LoConte, N. K., Gannon, R. E., Liou, J.-I., Heise, C. P. et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer with poor prognostic features. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 3381–3388 (2011). 5. Venook, A. P., Niedzwiecki, D., Lopatin, M., Ye, X., Lee, M., Friedman, P. N. et al. Biologic determinants of tumor recurrence in stage II colon cancer: validation study of the 12-gene recurrence score in cancer and leukemia group B (CALGB) 9581. J. Clin. Oncol. 31, 1775–1781 (2013).
Cited by
64 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|