QL1209 (pertuzumab biosimilar) versus reference pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel in neoadjuvant treatment for HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative, early or locally advanced breast cancer: A multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, parallel-controlled, phase III equivalence trial
-
Published:2024-06-21
Issue:4
Volume:131
Page:668-675
-
ISSN:0007-0920
-
Container-title:British Journal of Cancer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Br J Cancer
Author:
Zuo Wenjia, Wang Zhonghua, Qian Jun, Ma Xiaopeng, Niu Zhaofeng, Ou Jianghua, Mo Qinguo, Sun Jing, Li Xinzheng, Wang Qitang, Yao Yongzhong, Yu Guohua, Li Hongsheng, Chen Dedian, Zhang Hao, Geng Cuizhi, Qiao Guangdong, Zhao Mengmeng, Zhang Baihui, Kang Xiaoyan, Zhang JinORCID, Shao ZhiminORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Background
This randomized, parallel-controlled, double-blinded, phase III equivalence study evaluated the equivalence of a proposed pertuzumab biosimilar QL1209 to the pertuzumab (Perjeta®) each with trastuzumab and docetaxel in neoadjuvant treatment of early or locally advanced breast cancer patients with HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative.
Methods
Eligible patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to receive 4 cycles of neoadjuvant QL1209 or pertuzumab each with trastuzumab and docetaxel, and adjuvant treatment. The primary endpoint was total pathologic complete response (tpCR), with equivalence margins of 0.76 to 1.32.
Results
Among the 585 patients enrolled, 257 and 259 patients were assigned to the QL1209 and pertuzumab groups, respectively. The tpCR rates were comparable in the QL1209 (109/255, 42.75%; 90% CI 37.65 to 47.84) and pertuzumab (117/259, 45.17%; 90% CI 40.09 to 50.26) groups. The tpCR risk ratio was 0.95 (90% CI, 0.80 to 1.11), and the 90% CI fell within the predefined equivalence margin. The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event was decreased neutrophil count (10. 9% vs. 12.7%) in the QL1209 and pertuzumab groups.
Conclusions
QL1209 demonstrated equivalent efficacy and comparable safety profile to the reference pertuzumab in neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive, ER/PR-negative, early, or locally advanced breast cancer.
Trial registration
Chinadrugtrials.org CTR20201073; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04629846.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference36 articles.
1. Harbeck N, Penault-Llorca F, Cortes J, Gnant M, Houssami N, Poortmans P, et al. Breast cancer. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2019;5:66 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2 2. Loibl S, Gianni L. HER2-positive breast cancer. Lancet. 2017;389:2415–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32417-5 3. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, Roman L, Tseng LM, Liu MC, et al. Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in women with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(11)70336-9 4. Gianni L, Pienkowski T, Im YH, Tseng LM, Liu MC, Lluch A, et al. 5-year analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab in patients with locally advanced, inflammatory, or early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (NeoSphere): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:791–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(16)00163-7 5. Franklin MC, Carey KD, Vajdos FF, Leahy DJ, de Vos AM, Sliwkowski MX. Insights into ErbB signaling from the structure of the ErbB2-pertuzumab complex. Cancer Cell. 2004;5:317–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1535-6108(04)00083-2
|
|