Prospective evaluation of 92 serum protein biomarkers for early detection of ovarian cancer
-
Published:2022-01-14
Issue:9
Volume:126
Page:1301-1309
-
ISSN:0007-0920
-
Container-title:British Journal of Cancer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Br J Cancer
Author:
Mukama Trasias, Fortner Renée Turzanski, Katzke Verena, Hynes Lucas Cory, Petrera Agnese, Hauck Stefanie M.ORCID, Johnson TheronORCID, Schulze Matthias, Schiborn Catarina, Rostgaard-Hansen Agnetha Linn, Tjønneland Anne, Overvad Kim, Pérez María José Sánchez, Crous-Bou Marta, Chirlaque María-Dolores, Amiano Pilar, Ardanaz Eva, Watts Eleanor L., Travis Ruth C., Sacerdote Carlotta, Grioni Sara, Masala Giovanna, Signoriello Simona, Tumino RosarioORCID, Gram Inger T., Sandanger Torkjel M., Sartor Hanna, Lundin Eva, Idahl Annika, Heath Alicia K., Dossus LaureORCID, Weiderpass ElisabeteORCID, Kaaks RudolfORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Background
CA125 is the best available yet insufficiently sensitive biomarker for early detection of ovarian cancer. There is a need to identify novel biomarkers, which individually or in combination with CA125 can achieve adequate sensitivity and specificity for the detection of earlier-stage ovarian cancer.
Methods
In the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) cohort, we measured serum levels of 92 preselected proteins for 91 women who had blood sampled ≤18 months prior to ovarian cancer diagnosis, and 182 matched controls. We evaluated the discriminatory performance of the proteins as potential early diagnostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer.
Results
Nine of the 92 markers; CA125, HE4, FOLR1, KLK11, WISP1, MDK, CXCL13, MSLN and ADAM8 showed an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of ≥0.70 for discriminating between women diagnosed with ovarian cancer and women who remained cancer-free. All, except ADAM8, had shown at least equal discrimination in previous case-control comparisons. The discrimination of the biomarkers, however, was low for the lag-time of >9–18 months and paired combinations of CA125 with any of the 8 markers did not improve discrimination compared to CA125 alone.
Conclusion
Using pre-diagnostic serum samples, this study identified markers with good discrimination for the lag-time of 0–9 months. However, the discrimination was low in blood samples collected more than 9 months prior to diagnosis, and none of the markers showed major improvement in discrimination when added to CA125.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference27 articles.
1. Jacobs IJ, Menon U, Ryan A, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Kalsi JK, et al. Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2016;387:945–56. 2. Cohen JG, White M, Cruz A, Farias-Eisner R. In 2014, can we do better than CA125 in the early detection of ovarian cancer? World J Biol Chem. 2014;5:286–300. 3. Cramer DW, Bast RC, Berg CD, Diamandis EP, Godwin AK, Hartge P, et al. Ovarian cancer biomarker performance in prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial specimens. Cancer Prev Res. 2011;4:365–74. 4. Terry KL, Schock H, Fortner RT, Hüsing A, Fichorova RN, Yamamoto HS, et al. A prospective evaluation of early detection biomarkers for ovarian cancer in the European EPIC cohort. Clin Cancer Res J Am Assoc Cancer Res. 2016;22:4664–75. 5. Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Singh N, Ryan A, Karpinskyj C, et al. Ovarian cancer population screening and mortality after long-term follow-up in the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl. 2021;397:2182–93.
Cited by
28 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|