Metaplastic breast cancers frequently express immune checkpoint markers FOXP3 and PD-L1
-
Published:2020-09-17
Issue:11
Volume:123
Page:1665-1672
-
ISSN:0007-0920
-
Container-title:British Journal of Cancer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Br J Cancer
Author:
Kalaw Emarene, Lim Malcolm, Kutasovic Jamie R., Sokolova Anna, Taege Lucinda, Johnstone Kate, Bennett James, Saunus Jodi M., Niland Colleen, Ferguson Kaltin, Gresshoff Irma, Bettington Mark, Pathmanathan Nirmala, Tse Gary M., Papadimos David, Pathmanathan Rajadurai, Harris Gavin, Yamaguchi Rin, Tan Puay Hoon, Fox Stephen, O’Toole Sandra A., Simpson Peter T., Lakhani Sunil R., McCart Reed Amy E.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Metaplastic breast carcinoma encompasses a heterogeneous group of tumours with differentiation into squamous and/or spindle, chondroid, osseous or rhabdoid mesenchymal-looking elements. Emerging immunotherapies targeting Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) and immune-suppressing T cells (Tregs) may benefit metaplastic breast cancer patients, which are typically chemo-resistant and do not express hormone therapy targets.
Methods
We evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of PD-L1 and FOXP3, and the extent of tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in a large cohort of metaplastic breast cancers, with survival data.
Results
Metaplastic breast cancers were significantly enriched for PD-L1 positive tumour cells, compared to triple-negative ductal breast cancers (P < 0.0001), while there was no significant difference in PD-L1 positive TILs. Metaplastic breast cancers were also significantly enriched for TILs expressing FOXP3, with FOXP3 positive intra-tumoural TILs (iTILs) associated with an adverse prognostic outcome (P = 0.0226). Multivariate analysis identified FOXP3 iTILs expression status as an important independent prognostic factor for patient survival.
Conclusions
Our findings indicate the clinical significance and prognostic value of FOXP3, PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint and TILs in metaplastic breast cancer and confirm that a subset of metaplastics may benefit from immune-based therapies.
Funder
Department of Health | National Health and Medical Research Council
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference38 articles.
1. Lakhani S. R., Ellis I. O., Schnitt S. J., Tan P. H., van de Vijver M. J. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast 4th edn (eds Bosman, F. T., Jaffe, E. S., Lakhani, S. R., Oghaki, H.) (IARC, Lyon, 2012). 2. Hennessy, B. T., Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M., Stemke-Hale, K., Gilcrease, M. Z., Krishnamurthy, S., Lee, J. S. et al. Characterization of a naturally occurring breast cancer subset enriched in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and stem cell characteristics. Cancer Res. 69, 4116–4124 (2009). 3. Lai, H. W., Tseng, L. M., Chang, T. W., Kuo, Y. L., Hsieh, C. M., Chen, S. T. et al. The prognostic significance of metaplastic carcinoma of the breast (MCB)-a case controlled comparison study with infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Breast 22, 968–973 (2013). 4. Nelson, R. A., Guye, M. L., Luu, T. & Lai, L. L. Survival outcomes of metaplastic breast cancer patients: results from a US population-based analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 22, 24–31 (2015). 5. Al-Hilli, Z., Choong, G., Keeney, M. G., Visscher, D. W., Ingle, J. N., Goetz, M. P. et al. Metaplastic breast cancer has a poor response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 176, 709–716 (2019).
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|