How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research

Author:

Woof Victoria G.ORCID,Howell AnthonyORCID,McWilliams LornaORCID,Gareth Evans D.,French David P.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis review aimed to synthesise qualitative research on how women notified that they are at increased risk of breast cancer view their risk. Five electronic databases were systematically reviewed for qualitative research investigating how women who have received an increased breast cancer risk estimate appraise their risk status. Fourteen records reporting 12 studies were included and critically appraised. Data were thematically synthesised. Four analytical themes were generated. Women appraise their risk of breast cancer through comparison with their risk of other familial diseases. Clinically derived risk estimates were understood in relation to pre-conceived risk appraisals, with incongruences met with surprise. Family history is relied upon strongly, with women exploring similarities and differences in attributes between themselves and affected relatives to gauge the likelihood of diagnosis. Women at increased risk reported living under a cloud of inevitability or uncertainty regarding diagnosis, resulting in concerns about risk management. Women hold stable appraisals of their breast cancer risk which appear to be mainly formed through their experiences of breast cancer in the family. Healthcare professionals should explore women’s personal risk appraisals prior to providing clinically derived risk estimates in order to address misconceptions, reduce concerns about inevitability and increase perceived control over risk reduction.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference56 articles.

1. NICE. Familial breast cancer: classification, care and managing breast cancer and related risks in people with a family history of breast cancer. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. 2017. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg164/resources/familial-breast-cancer-classification-care-and-managing-breast-cancer-and-related-risks-in-people-with-a-family-history-of-breast-cancer-pdf-35109691767493. Accessed Jan 2022.

2. French D, Marteau T. Communicating risk. In: Llewellyn C, Ayers S, McManus IC, Newman SP, Petrie K, Revenson T, Weinman J, editors. Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019.

3. Brust-Renck PG, Royer CE, Reyna VF. Communicating numerical risk: Human factors that aid understanding in health care. Rev Hum Factors Ergon. 2013;8:235–76.

4. Weinstein ND. What does it mean to understand a risk? Evaluating risk comprehension. JNCI Monogr. 1999;1999:15–20.

5. Hopwood P. Breast cancer risk perception: what do we know and understand? Breast Cancer Res. 2000;2:1–5.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3