Adding cetuximab to paclitaxel and carboplatin for first-line treatment of carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP): results of the Phase 2 AIO trial PACET-CUP
-
Published:2020-11-25
Issue:4
Volume:124
Page:721-727
-
ISSN:0007-0920
-
Container-title:British Journal of Cancer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Br J Cancer
Author:
Folprecht Gunnar, , Trautmann Karolin, Stein Alexander, Huebner Gerdt, Stahl Michael, Kasper Stefan, Kretzschmar Albrecht, Köhne Claus-Henning, Grünwald ViktorORCID, Hofheinz Ralf-Dieter, Schütte Katharina, Löffler Harald, Bokemeyer Carsten, Krämer Alwin
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) have a dismal prognosis, even when treated with multi-agent chemotherapy. We hypothesised that adding the epidermal growth-factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor cetuximab to standard first-line chemotherapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin would improve PFS and RR in unfavourable CUP.
Methods
This open-labelled, multicentre Phase 2 study included patients with unfavourable, untreated adeno- or undifferentiated CUP. Patients were randomised to receive either paclitaxel/carboplatin (group A) or paclitaxel/carboplatin plus cetuximab (group B) every 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 cycles followed by cetuximab maintenance in group B. The primary endpoint was PFS in the two groups. Secondary endpoints were RR, toxicity and overall survival (OS).
Results
One-hundred-and-fifty patients were randomised (group A = 72, group B = 78). The median PFS and OS for all patients were 3.8 and 8.1 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.9–4.8 and 6.8–9.5). There was no significant difference in PFS (3.7 vs 4.6 months, HR 0.98) or OS (8.1 vs 7.4, HR 1.1) between the two treatment groups. Response rate tended to be better for chemotherapy plus cetuximab compared to chemotherapy alone (22% vs 15%). Adverse events grade ≥3 were comparable between the two groups, except for significantly increased skin toxicity in the cetuximab arm.
Conclusions
Cetuximab plus paclitaxel/carboplatin did not improve PFS, OS and RR in metastatic CUP compared to paclitaxel/carboplatin alone. Addition of cetuximab resulted in additional skin toxicity.
Clinical trial registration
The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00894569.
Funder
Merck KGaA Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO), CUP working group
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference24 articles.
1. Rassy, E. & Pavlidis, N. The currently declining incidence of cancer of unknown primary. Cancer Epidemiol. 61, 139–141 (2019). 2. Pavlidis, N. & Pentheroudakis, G. Cancer of unknown primary site. Lancet. 379, 1428–1435 (2012). 3. Conway, A.-M., Mitchell, C., Kilgour, E., Brady, G., Dive, C. & Cook, N. Molecular characterisation and liquid biomarkers in carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP): taking the ‘U’ out of ‘CUP.’. Br. J. Cancer 120, 141–153 (2019). 4. Jones, W., Allardice, G., Scott, I., Oien, K., Brewster, D. & Morrison, D. S. Cancers of unknown primary diagnosed during hospitalization: a population-based study. BMC Cancer 17, 85 (2017). 5. Varghese, A. M., Arora, A., Capanu, M., Camacho, N., Won, H. H., Zehir, A. et al. Clinical and molecular characterization of patients with cancer of unknown primary in the modern era. Ann. Oncol. 28, 3015–3021 (2017).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|