The Glasgow Microenvironment Score associates with prognosis and adjuvant chemotherapy response in colorectal cancer
-
Published:2020-11-23
Issue:4
Volume:124
Page:786-796
-
ISSN:0007-0920
-
Container-title:British Journal of Cancer
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Br J Cancer
Author:
Alexander Peter G.ORCID, Roseweir Antonia K., Pennel Kathryn A. F., van Wyk Hester C., Powell Arfon G. M. T.ORCID, McMillan Donald C.ORCID, Horgan Paul G., Kelly Caroline, Hay Jennifer, Sansom Owen, Harkin Andrea, Roxburgh Campbell S. D., Graham Janet, Church David N.ORCID, Tomlinson IanORCID, Saunders Mark, Iveson Tim J., Edwards JoanneORCID, Park James H.ORCID
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The Glasgow Microenvironment Score (GMS) combines peritumoural inflammation and tumour stroma percentage to assess interactions between tumour and microenvironment. This was previously demonstrated to associate with colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis, and now requires validation and assessment of interactions with adjuvant therapy.
Methods
Two cohorts were utilised; 862 TNM I–III CRC validation cohort, and 2912 TNM II–III CRC adjuvant chemotherapy cohort (TransSCOT). Primary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). Exploratory endpoint was adjuvant chemotherapy interaction.
Results
GMS independently associated with DFS (p = 0.001) and RFS (p < 0.001). GMS significantly stratified RFS for both low risk (GMS 0 v GMS 2: HR 3.24 95% CI 1.85–5.68, p < 0.001) and high-risk disease (GMS 0 v GMS 2: HR 2.18 95% CI 1.39–3.41, p = 0.001). In TransSCOT, chemotherapy type (pinteraction = 0.013), but not duration (p = 0.64) was dependent on GMS. Furthermore, GMS 0 significantly associated with improved DFS in patients receiving FOLFOX compared with CAPOX (HR 2.23 95% CI 1.19–4.16, p = 0.012).
Conclusions
This study validates the GMS as a prognostic tool for patients with stage I–III colorectal cancer, independent of TNM, with the ability to stratify both low- and high-risk disease. Furthermore, GMS 0 could be employed to identify a subset of patients that benefit from FOLFOX over CAPOX.
Funder
Hugh Fraser Foundation Non-Clinical Lectureship grant Cancer Research UK
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference31 articles.
1. World_Health_Organisation. Cancer [WHO international web site]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer (2019) 2. Roxburgh, C. S., McMillan, D. C., Richards, C. H., Atwan, M., Anderson, J. H., Harvey, T. et al. The clinical utility of the combination of T stage and venous invasion to predict survival in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer. Ann. Surg. 259, 1156–1165 (2014). 3. Loughrey, M. B., Quirke, P. & Shepherd, N. A. in Standards and datasets for reporting cancers Dataset for histopathological reporting of colorectal cancer September 2018. Pathologists RCo, editor. (The Royal College of Pathologists, London; 2019) https://www.rcpath.org/resourceLibrary/g049-dataset-for-histopathological-reporting-of-colorectal-cancer.html. 4. Dienstmann, R., Mason, M. J., Sinicrope, F. A., Phipps, A. I., Tejpar, S., Nesbakken, A. et al. Prediction of overall survival in stage II and III colon cancer beyond TNM system: a retrospective, pooled biomarker study. Ann. Oncol. 28, 1023–1031 (2017). 5. Petersen, V. C., Baxter, K. J., Love, S. B. & Shepherd, N. A. Identification of objective pathological prognostic determinants and models of prognosis in Dukes’ B colon cancer. Gut 51, 65–69 (2002).
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|