Abstract
AbstractHumans frequently use tools to reduce action-related efforts. Interestingly, several studies have demonstrated that individuals had tool-related biases in terms of perceived effort reduction during motor imagery tasks, despite the lack of evidence of real benefits. Reduced effort allocation has been repeatedly found in schizophrenia, but it remains unknown how schizophrenia patients perceive tool-related benefits regarding effort. Twenty-four schizophrenia patients and twenty-four nonclinical participants were instructed to move the same quantities of objects with their hands or with a tool in both real and imagined situations. Imagined and real movement durations were recorded. Similarly to nonclinical participants, patients overestimated tool-related benefits and underestimated tool-related effort in terms of time when they mentally simulated a task requiring the use of a tool. No association between movement durations and psychotic symptoms was found. Our results open new perspectives on the issue of effort in schizophrenia.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health
Reference56 articles.
1. Baber, C. Cognition and Tool Use: Forms of Engagement in Human and Animal Use of Tools (CRC Press, 2003).
2. Goldenberg, G. & Iriki, A. From sticks to coffee-maker: mastery of tools and technology and non-human primates. Cortex 43, 285–288 (2007).
3. Osiurak, F., Morgado, N., Vallet, G. T., Drot, M. & Palluel-Germain, R. Getting a tool gives wings: overestimation of tool-related benefits in a motor imagery task and a decision task. Psychol. Res. 78, 1–9 (2014).
4. Danel, S., Osiurak, F. & von Bayern, A. M. P. From the age of 5 humans decide economically, whereas crows exhibit individual preferences. Sci. Rep. 7, 17043 (2017).
5. Shumaker, R. W., Walkup, K. R. & Beck, B. B. Animal Tool Behavior: The Use and Manufacture of Tools by Animals (JHU Press, 2011).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献