Safe and just Earth system boundaries
Author:
Rockström JohanORCID, Gupta JoyeetaORCID, Qin Dahe, Lade Steven J.ORCID, Abrams Jesse F.ORCID, Andersen Lauren S.ORCID, Armstrong McKay David I.ORCID, Bai XuemeiORCID, Bala GovindasamyORCID, Bunn Stuart E.ORCID, Ciobanu Daniel, DeClerck FabriceORCID, Ebi KristieORCID, Gifford LaurenORCID, Gordon Christopher, Hasan SyezlinORCID, Kanie Norichika, Lenton Timothy M.ORCID, Loriani SinaORCID, Liverman Diana M., Mohamed AwazORCID, Nakicenovic Nebojsa, Obura DavidORCID, Ospina Daniel, Prodani Klaudia, Rammelt CrelisORCID, Sakschewski BorisORCID, Scholtens JoeriORCID, Stewart-Koster BenORCID, Tharammal ThejnaORCID, van Vuuren DetlefORCID, Verburg Peter H., Winkelmann Ricarda, Zimm CarolineORCID, Bennett Elena M., Bringezu StefanORCID, Broadgate WendyORCID, Green Pamela A.ORCID, Huang Lei, Jacobson LisaORCID, Ndehedehe ChristopherORCID, Pedde SimonaORCID, Rocha Juan, Scheffer MartenORCID, Schulte-Uebbing LenaORCID, de Vries WimORCID, Xiao Cunde, Xu ChiORCID, Xu Xinwu, Zafra-Calvo NoeliaORCID, Zhang XinORCID
Abstract
AbstractThe stability and resilience of the Earth system and human well-being are inseparably linked1–3, yet their interdependencies are generally under-recognized; consequently, they are often treated independently4,5. Here, we use modelling and literature assessment to quantify safe and just Earth system boundaries (ESBs) for climate, the biosphere, water and nutrient cycles, and aerosols at global and subglobal scales. We propose ESBs for maintaining the resilience and stability of the Earth system (safe ESBs) and minimizing exposure to significant harm to humans from Earth system change (a necessary but not sufficient condition for justice)4. The stricter of the safe or just boundaries sets the integrated safe and just ESB. Our findings show that justice considerations constrain the integrated ESBs more than safety considerations for climate and atmospheric aerosol loading. Seven of eight globally quantified safe and just ESBs and at least two regional safe and just ESBs in over half of global land area are already exceeded. We propose that our assessment provides a quantitative foundation for safeguarding the global commons for all people now and into the future.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Multidisciplinary
Reference133 articles.
1. IPBES. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5657041 (2019). 2. Folke, C. et al. Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere. Ambio 50, 834–869 (2021). 3. IPCC Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022). 4. Rockström, J. et al. Identifying a safe and just corridor for people and the planet. Earth’s Future 9, e2020EF001866 (2021). 5. Rockström, J. et al. Stockholm to Stockholm: achieving a safe Earth requires goals that incorporate a just approach. One Earth 4, 1209–1211 (2021).
Cited by
340 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|