BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 escape antibodies elicited by Omicron infection
Author:
Cao YunlongORCID, Yisimayi Ayijiang, Jian FanchongORCID, Song Weiliang, Xiao Tianhe, Wang Lei, Du ShuoORCID, Wang JingORCID, Li Qianqian, Chen Xiaosu, Yu Yuanling, Wang Peng, Zhang ZhiyingORCID, Liu Pulan, An Ran, Hao Xiaohua, Wang Yao, Wang Jing, Feng Rui, Sun Haiyan, Zhao Lijuan, Zhang Wen, Zhao Dong, Zheng Jiang, Yu Lingling, Li Can, Zhang Na, Wang Rui, Niu Xiao, Yang Sijie, Song Xuetao, Chai Yangyang, Hu Ye, Shi Yansong, Zheng Linlin, Li Zhiqiang, Gu Qingqing, Shao Fei, Huang WeijinORCID, Jin RonghuaORCID, Shen ZhongyangORCID, Wang YouchunORCID, Wang XiangxiORCID, Xiao JunyuORCID, Xie Xiaoliang SunneyORCID
Abstract
AbstractSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron sublineages BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 exhibit higher transmissibility than the BA.2 lineage1. The receptor binding and immune-evasion capability of these recently emerged variants require immediate investigation. Here, coupled with structural comparisons of the spike proteins, we show that BA.2.12.1, BA.4 and BA.5 (BA.4 and BA.5 are hereafter referred collectively to as BA.4/BA.5) exhibit similar binding affinities to BA.2 for the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. Of note, BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/BA.5 display increased evasion of neutralizing antibodies compared with BA.2 against plasma from triple-vaccinated individuals or from individuals who developed a BA.1 infection after vaccination. To delineate the underlying antibody-evasion mechanism, we determined the escape mutation profiles2, epitope distribution3 and Omicron-neutralization efficiency of 1,640 neutralizing antibodies directed against the receptor-binding domain of the viral spike protein, including 614 antibodies isolated from people who had recovered from BA.1 infection. BA.1 infection after vaccination predominantly recalls humoral immune memory directed against ancestral (hereafter referred to as wild-type (WT)) SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The resulting elicited antibodies could neutralize both WT SARS-CoV-2 and BA.1 and are enriched on epitopes on spike that do not bind ACE2. However, most of these cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies are evaded by spike mutants L452Q, L452R and F486V. BA.1 infection can also induce new clones of BA.1-specific antibodies that potently neutralize BA.1. Nevertheless, these neutralizing antibodies are largely evaded by BA.2 and BA.4/BA.5 owing to D405N and F486V mutations, and react weakly to pre-Omicron variants, exhibiting narrow neutralization breadths. The therapeutic neutralizing antibodies bebtelovimab4 and cilgavimab5 can effectively neutralize BA.2.12.1 and BA.4/BA.5, whereas the S371F, D405N and R408S mutations undermine most broadly sarbecovirus-neutralizing antibodies. Together, our results indicate that Omicron may evolve mutations to evade the humoral immunity elicited by BA.1 infection, suggesting that BA.1-derived vaccine boosters may not achieve broad-spectrum protection against new Omicron variants.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Multidisciplinary
Reference59 articles.
1. Chen, C. et al. CoV-spectrum: analysis of globally shared SARS-CoV-2 data to identify and characterize new variants. Bioinformatics 38, 1735–1737 (2021). 2. Greaney, A. J. et al. Complete mapping of mutations to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain that escape antibody recognition. Cell Host Microbe 29, 44–57.e49 (2021). 3. Cao, Y. et al. Omicron escapes the majority of existing SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies. Nature 602, 657–663 (2022). 4. Westendorf, K. et al. LY-CoV1404 (bebtelovimab) potently neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 variants. Cell Rep. 39, 110812 (2022). 5. Zost, S. J. et al. Potently neutralizing and protective human antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. Nature 584, 443–449 (2020).
Cited by
1019 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|