Abstract
AbstractConservation, restoration and land management are increasingly implemented at landscape scales1,2. However, because species interaction data are typically habitat- and/or guild-specific, exactly how those interactions connect habitats and affect the stability and function of communities at landscape scales remains poorly understood. We combine multi-guild species interaction data (plant–pollinator and three plant–herbivore–parasitoid communities, collected from landscapes with one, two or three habitats), a field experiment and a modelling approach to show that multi-habitat landscapes support higher species and interaction evenness, more complementary species interactions and more consistent robustness to species loss. These emergent network properties drive improved pollination success in landscapes with more habitats and are not explained by simply summing component habitat webs. Linking landscape composition, through community structure, to ecosystem function, highlights mechanisms by which several contiguous habitats can support landscape-scale ecosystem services.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference55 articles.
1. Mace, G. M. Whose conservation? Science 345, 1558–1560 (2014).
2. Lawton, J. H. et al. Making Space for Nature: A Review of England’s Wildlife Sites and Ecological Network (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2010).
3. Sirami, C. et al. Increasing crop heterogeneity enhances multitrophic diversity across agricultural regions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 16442–16447 (2019).
4. Ben-Hur, E. & Kadmon, R. An experimental test of the area–heterogeneity tradeoff. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 4815–4822 (2020).
5. Watling, J. I. et al. Support for the habitat amount hypothesis from a global synthesis of species density studies. Ecol. Lett. 23, 674–681 (2020).